The arXiv is an electronic repository containing scientific papers, both published and as pre-prints, in the areas of physics, mathematics, computer science, mathematical biology, quantitative finance and statistics. That's a lot of areas and there are a lot of papers on the arXiv: over 860,000. But physicists Damien George and Rob Knegjens have got to grips with them all. They have constructed a clever algorithm to visualise the vast paper galaxy. As explained on their website, the algorithm is based on two "forces" that determine the papers' positions on a map based on citations between papers: "each paper is repelled from all other papers using an anti-gravity inverse-distance force, and each paper is attracted to all of its references using a spring modelled by Hooke's law." Each paper on the map is represented by a circle and the area of that circle is proportional to the number of citations the paper has.
The result is not only pretty but also informative and interactive, showing how papers clump together and how different areas relate. Click here to use the map and to find out more.
If you've enjoyed the origami articles on Plus and live in or near London, then here's your chance to see some origami live. The Japan Foundation has invited Toshikazu Kawasaki, creator of the Kawasaki rose, to give a special talk on 27 August 2013. Kawasaki, a renowned origami theorist and maths teacher by profession, will talk about his approach to the paper craft with actual origami demonstrations. His talk will also explore his role as an origami master and how his passion for origami and maths led him to become the world's first doctor of origami. During the talk the audience can also put their origami skills to the test with the instruction of Kawasaki.
The event will take place at The Japan Foundation, Russell Square House, 10-12 Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH. It's free but booking is essential. To reserve a place, please email your name and the title of the event to email@example.com.
This year's British Science Festival will take place from 7 - 12 September at the University of Newcastle and there's plenty of (mostly free) maths on offer.
You can take part in some pioneering maths at PrimeGrid: Search for a world record prime number on 7 September. Learn about prime numbers with more than a thousand digits, the history of the search for large primes, and how you can use your computer to join PrimeGrid and find new primes of your own.
The randomness show on 8 September explores randomness in your life, and the ways in which maths can order the chaos around us. You can delve into mathematical history, discover how maths can be used to predict the future and uncover the hidden maths inside you.
Be a maths millionaire on 11 September is all about famous mathematical equations and the adventures of the mathematicians working on them, including those that make Google work.
If you're interested in economics then An insight into financial markets and trading on 11 September may be for you: it will have a real time interactive workshop exploring financial markets. You can get to grips with data, charts and financial information in the trading room. This event costs £4.
Slide into the maths museum on 7 September explores the maths needed to crack the fastest slide and build skateboarding tracks. The UK's first museum entirely dedicated to mathematics wants to know what you would like at the museum. This event costs £10.85 for adults and there are various concession rates.
For the beady-eyed, see if you can spot Dr Math's giant logic puzzles all around the festival and how many of his mind-bending brain-twisters you can solve.
Number theory is famous for problems that everyone can understand and that are easy to express, but that are fiendishly difficult to prove. Here are some of our favourites.
The Goldbach conjecture
The Goldbach conjecture is named after the mathematician Christian Goldbach who formulated it in the middle of the eighteenth century. It states that any even natural number greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two prime numbers.
Leonard Euler (1707-1783) corresponded with Christian Goldbach about the conjecture now named after the latter.
It is easy to see that this is true for the first few even numbers greater than 2:
This seems so straightforward you might be tempted to try and prove it yourself — and you'd be in very good company as some of the brightest mathematical minds have been chiselling away at the conjecture ever since it was first pronounced. But so far without success. The closest result that has been proved, in 1995, says that every even number is the sum of at most six primes.
There is a similar statement, called the weak Goldbach conjecture, which says that every odd natural number greater than 5 is the sum of three primes. Again we can see that this is true for the first few odd numbers greater than 5:
7 = 3+2+2
This statement is called "weak" because once someone finds a proof for the ordinary "strong" Goldbach conjecture, the weak one can be deduced from it.
In 1938 Nils Pipping showed that the (strong) Goldbach conjecture is true for even numbers up to and including 105. The latest result, established using a computer search, shows it is true for even numbers up to and including 4 x 1018 — that's a huge number, but for mathematicians it isn't good enough. Only a general proof will do.
A perfect number is a number that's the sum of all of its divisors (excluding itself). For example, 6 is a perfect number because its divisors (apart from 6 itself) are 1, 2 and 3, and
6 = 1 + 2 + 3.
The next perfect number is 28, which has divisors 1, 2, 4, 7 and 14, and:
28 = 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14.
Euclid, depicted with a compass in Raphael's painting The school of Athens.
The next three perfect numbers are 496, 8128 and 33,550,336.
The gaps between perfect numbers are as wide as their discovery has been painstaking. The first four perfect numbers seem to have been known to the Greeks, the fifth and sixth weren't written down explicitly until the 15th century and the seventh followed in the 16th century. Today we know of 48 perfect number, the largest of which has over 34 million digits. All of these 48 are even. This raises two questions:
Are there infinitely many perfect numbers?
Are there any odd perfect numbers?
So far no one has been able to answer these questions with a conclusive proof.
One thing that was already known to the Greek mathematician Euclid over 2,000 years ago is that if p is a prime number and 2p-1 is also a prime number, then 2p-1(2p-1) is an even perfect number. For example,
21(22-1) = 6
22(23-1) = 28.
The 18th century mathematician Leonhard Euler proved that every even perfect number is of this form. The largest known perfect number, the one with over 34 million digits, is
257885160 x (257885161−1).
This leads us straight to our next number mystery.
Marin Mersenne, (1588-1648).
Prime numbers are those numbers that are divisible only by themselves and 1. The first few are 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11. Unlike for perfect numbers we do know that there are infinitely many of them. The proof for that was furnished by Euclid, however there is no easy recipe that generates all the prime numbers. This is where numbers of the form 2p-1, where p is a prime, come in useful. These are called Mersenne numbers, after the French monk Marin Mersenne (1588-1648) who studied them, and they have a good chance of being prime themselves.
The question is, are there infinitely many such Mersenne primes? Mathematicians believe that there probably are, but again nobody has as yet been able to prove that conjecture. A total of 48 Mersenne primes have been found so far, the largest, discovered in January 2013, being
257885161 − 1.
These correspond to the 48 known perfect numbers. The search for larger and larger Mersenne primes continues, as does the search for a conclusive proof that there are infinitely many.
And there is more...
Another favourite number theory mystery is the twin prime conjecture, which states that there are infinitely many pairs of primes that are 2 apart. There's been recent progress on this, so we refer you to our news story. One mystery that has been solved, after over 350 years of effort, is Fermat's last theorem. We recently celebrated the twentieth anniversary of the announcement of its proof — you can find out more here. That's probably enough to fill a minute, but if you haven't had enough you can read more about number theory, prime numbers, Mersenne primes and the search for larger and larger primes here on Plus.
Over 2000 years ago the Greek mathematician Euclid came up with a list of five postulates on which he thought geometry should be built. One of them, the fifth, was equivalent to a statement we are all familiar with: that the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees. However, this postulate did not seem as obvious as the other four on Euclid's list, so mathematicians attempted to deduce it from them: to show that a geometry obeying the first four postulates would necessarily obey the fifth. Their struggle continued for centuries, but in the end they failed. They found examples of geometries that do not obey the fifth postulate.
Image: Lars H. Rohwedder.
In spherical geometry the Euclidean idea of a line becomes a great circle, that is, a circle of maximum radius spanning right around the fattest part of the sphere. It is no longer true that the sum of the angles of a triangle is always 180 degrees. Very small triangles will have angles summing to only a little more than 180 degrees (because, from the perspective of a very small triangle, the surface of a sphere is nearly flat). Bigger triangles will have angles summing to very much more than 180 degrees.
One funny thing about the length of time it took to discover spherical geometry is that it is the geometry that holds on the surface of the Earth! But we never really notice, because we are so small compared to the size of the Earth that if we draw a triangle on the ground, and measure its angles, the amount by which the sum of the angles exceeds 180 degrees is so tiny that we can't detect it.
But there is another geometry that takes things in the other direction:
Hyperbolic geometry isn't as easy to visualise as spherical geometry because it can't be modelled in three-dimensional Euclidean space without distortion. One way of visualising it is called the Poincaré disc.
Take a round disc, like the one bounded by the blue circle in the figure on the right, and imagine an ant living within it. In Euclidean geometry the shortest path between two points inside that disc is along a straight line. In hyperbolic geometry distances are measured differently so the shortest path is no longer along a Euclidean straight line but along the arc of a circle that meets the boundary of the disc at right angles, like the one shown in red in the figure. A hyperbolic ant would experience the straight-line path as a detour — it prefers to move along the arc of such a circle.
A hyperbolic triangle, whose sides are arcs of these semicircles, has angles that add up to less than 180 degrees. All the black and white shapes in the figure on the left are hyperbolic triangles.
One consequence of this new hyperbolic metric is that the boundary circle of the disc is infinitely far away from the point of view of the hyperbolic ant. This is because the metric distorts distances with respect to the ordinary Euclidean one. Paths that look the same length in the Euclidean metric are longer in the hyperbolic metric the closer they are to the boundary circle.
The figure below shows a tiling of the hyperbolic plane by regular heptagons. Because of the distorted metric the heptagons are all of the same size in the hyperbolic metric. And as we can see the ant would need to traverse infinitely many of them to get to the boundary circle — it is infinitely far away!
Image created by David Wright.
Hyperbolic geometry may look like a fanciful mathematical construct but it has real-life uses. When Einstein developed his special theory of relativity in 1905 he found that the symmetries of hyperbolic geometry were exactly what he needed to formulate the theory. Today mathematicians believe that hyperbolic geometry may help to understand large networks like Facebook or the Internet.
Right. That's it. We're convinced. We are officially behind team ! Pronounced "tau", 6.28318... There is a movement that it should replace the use of that favourite mathematical constant, . We're not sure if it's likely that will go gently into that dark night, but Phil Moriaty certainly makes a good case for the use of in teaching in this episode of Numberphile, released in honour of today being Tau day (June 28 is 6.28 when written in the US date format).
And Vi Hart explains that not only is the logical choice, it will return beauty to trigonometry...
Phew. Now we know that Euler's identity is safe in 's hand, we definitely vote ! Happy Tau Day everyone!