Bibliography
Issue 16Perigal bibliography

On geometric dissections and transformations in volume 1 of The Messenger of Mathematics and On geometric dissections and transformations II. in volume 2 of The Messenger of Mathematics (18745), both by Henry Perigal.
These two articles were as close as Henry Perigal came to orthodox scientific publication. He was the author of many other items, but nearly all probably at his own expense. These two were solicited by his friend and colleague James Glaisher, an orthodox professional mathematician (author of several articles on mathematics in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, for example), whose comments are included at the end of the first. The first one contains the famous dissection proof of Pythagoras' Theorem, while the second shows how to dissect a square and rearrange the pieces so to make up a rectangle of given length. (This is the converse of Euclid's II.14.)
Link to copies of the two articles

Geometric dissections and transpositions, by Henry Perigal, published under the auspices of the Association for the Improvement of Geometrical Teaching.
This very brief pamphlet contains an extract from the Messenger of Mathematics articles, and a sequence of dissection diagrams, probably engraved on wood by Henry himself, without comment.
Link to one of the dissections from this pamphlet

Trochoidal curves by Augustus De Morgan in volume XXV of the Penny Cyclopaedia, Charles Knight & Co, London, 1836.
This is just one, although by no means one of the most interesting, of the huge number of articles contributed to Charles Knight's encyclopaedia by De Morgan. Most of them, especially those on the history of mathematics, are very readable even though somewhat out of date.

A Budget of Paradoxes by Augustus De Morgan, Dover reprint, 1954.
This is a collection of De Morgan's articles on cranks (or paradoxers, as he called them) from the Athenaeum, made by his wife after his death.

Henry Perigal, a short record of his life and works by Frederick Perigal, Bowles & Sons, London, 1901.

Otto Negebauer, Mathematische KeilschrifteTexte, SpringerVerlag, 1935.
Table 3 of Part II is a photograph of the Babylonian tablet BM (British Museum) 15285. The middle two images have a striking affinity with Perigal's dissection for the isosceles right triangle. The Babylonians certainly knew that in some sense the ratio of the diagonal of a square to a side was a square root of 2.

Aydin Sayili, Thabit ibn Qurra's generalization of the Pythagorean Theorem, ISIS 47 (1956), pages 3537.

Paul Mahlo, Topologische Untersuchungen uber Zerlegung in ebene und spharische Polygone, Dissertation, Halle, 1908.

Major P. MacMahon, Pythagoras's Theorem as a repeating pattern, Nature 109 (1922), page 479.

Felix Bernstein, Der Pythagoraische Lehrsatz, Zeitschriften fur Mathematischen und Naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht 55 (1924), pages 204  207.
It was apparently Paul Mahlo who first pointed out that one could obtain a continuous family of dissection proofs of Pythagoras' Theorem by overlaying two tilings of the plane. This was discovered independently by at least a few others, notably Major MacMahon and Felix Bernstein.

V. G. Boltyanskii, Equivalent and indecomposable figures, translated from the Russian, 1956.
This very pleasant book deals with the theory of dissections in two and three dimensions. In two dimensions, the principal result, formulated explicitly and proven early in the nineteenth century, is that two polygonal regions of equal area can always be dissected into matching congruent pieces. It can be argued that Euclid's treatment of area depends implicitly on this observation.

Johan L. Dupont and ChihHan Sah, Homology of Euclidean groups of motions made discrete and Euclidean scissors congruences, Acta Mathematica 164 (1990), pages 1  27.
This is just one of a series of papers written by Dupont and Sah integrating the theory of dissections into modern mathematics.

Dissections: Plane & Fancy by Greg Frederickson, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
My debt to Greg is enormous. It was he who started me on my quest to discover what I could about Henry Perigal, and in particular it was he who told me about the grave. It was also he who told me about Pythagoras tilings. And it was Greg who noticed that among `respectable' institutions, it is Cambridge University that has contributed most to the topic of dissections.
Link to Greg's web page about dissections