Great article, no doubt.
Comes with a flaw towards the end, though.
It says 'Unfortunately there are still few jurors, lawyers, and judges who understand the statistical subtleties of such evidence'.

I bet you wanted to say 'Unfortunately there are still few jurors, lawyers, and judges who DO NOT understand the statistical subtleties of such evidence'

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.