Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Popular topics and tags

    Shapes

    • Geometry
    • Vectors and matrices
    • Topology
    • Networks and graph theory
    • Fractals

    Numbers

    • Number theory
    • Arithmetic
    • Prime numbers
    • Fermat's last theorem
    • Cryptography

    Computing and information

    • Quantum computing
    • Complexity
    • Information theory
    • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
    • Algorithm

    Data and probability

    • Statistics
    • Probability and uncertainty
    • Randomness

    Abstract structures

    • Symmetry
    • Algebra and group theory
    • Vectors and matrices

    Physics

    • Fluid dynamics
    • Quantum physics
    • General relativity, gravity and black holes
    • Entropy and thermodynamics
    • String theory and quantum gravity

    Arts, humanities and sport

    • History and philosophy of mathematics
    • Art and Music
    • Language
    • Sport

    Logic, proof and strategy

    • Logic
    • Proof
    • Game theory

    Calculus and analysis

    • Differential equations
    • Calculus

    Towards applications

    • Mathematical modelling
    • Dynamical systems and Chaos

    Applications

    • Medicine and health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biology
    • Economics and finance
    • Engineering and architecture
    • Weather forecasting
    • Climate change

    Understanding of mathematics

    • Public understanding of mathematics
    • Education

    Get your maths quickly

    • Maths in a minute

    Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • Audiences

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Monte Carlo Monopoly

    by
    K.E.M.& R.E.H.
    1 May, 1999
    May 1999


    Dr. John Haigh, a mathematics lecturer from the University of Sussex, has found the ultimate strategy for winning at Monopoly: use the help of a computer!

    Dr. Haigh wanted to discover which were the best squares to buy and build hotels and houses on. He wrote a program that simulated an enormously long game - more than ten million rolls of the dice - in order to discover which squares players were most likely to land on. While greedy players are tempted to go for the high-rent squares such as Park Lane and Mayfair, he found that the orange squares - Vine Street, Bow Street and Marlborough Street - are the handiest squares to own, because of their proximity to the Jail square.

    "Because Go To Jail is the most frequently visited square, you need streets which your opponents are likely to land on when they are released. The orange and red squares are best and the green and light blue the worst, because they are not favoured by their positioning to the jail", he told Michael Fleet of the Daily Telegraph.

    Dr. Haigh has recently published a new book, Taking Chances, which is all about using probability in everyday life.

    Exploring probability distributions with computer simulation

    Dr Haigh's calculations are an example of the application of a general method called the {\em Monte Carlo Method}. This method is sometimes used to calculate a quantity which has an exact value, but which is unknown, by using many random "trials". \par For example, suppose we want to know $p$, the probability of getting two ones when we roll a pair of dice. Obviously, we could calculate this exactly, by simply using the standard methods of probability: $p=1/36$. But suppose that we didn't know that, and wanted to use the Monte Carlo method instead. What we would do is roll a pair of dice thousands of times, either by hand or more likely by getting a computer to do it. We might get 273 double ones in 10000, so we would estimate that $p$ is approximately 0.0273 - a bit too low. \par Dr Haigh got a computer to make millions of dice rolls and used those rolls to work out where a Monopoly player would move on the board. What he was trying to find out was the relative probabilities of landing on each possible square in the game, and the Monte Carlo method gave him approximations to those probabilities. He found that the probability of landing on Trafalgar Square was greater than landing on any other street name.

    Random dots falling inside (pink) and outside (blue) a circle.

    Random dots falling inside (pink) and outside (blue) a circle.

    Another famous example of the Monte Carlo method is to calculate $\pi$. Get the computer to generate two random numbers $x$ and $y$, each in the range -1 to 1, so that the point $\left(x,y\right)$ lies somewhere randomly inside a square of side 2 units. Do this thousands of times, and count up what proportion of the points also lie inside the circle (you can tell whether a point does or not by working out whether ${x^2}+{y^2}<1$). The proportion inside the circle is an approximation to $\pi/4$ (because the circle has area $\pi$ but the square has area 4). This gives roughly the right answer, but you need millions of points to get anything like a good estimate!

    Read more about...
    strategy
    computer simulation
    Monte Carlo method
    Monopoly board game
    • Log in or register to post comments

    Read more about...

    strategy
    computer simulation
    Monte Carlo method
    Monopoly board game
    University of Cambridge logo

    Plus is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
    Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

    Terms