# Russian roulette solution

## Russian roulette

Your mother did tell you to stay away from gambling, but now it's far, far too late to head her advice. You're sitting in a smoke-filled room, your single opponent staring you down. Between you, on a table, there is six-shot revolver, containing exactly one live bullet. Someone has spun the cylinder so neither of you knows whether the next shot will be blank or lethal. Each of you will take one shot at the opponent in turn, and the cylinder will be spun again after each shot. The game ends, obviously, when one of you fires the lethal shot, and the other person is dead. It's your choice whether to go first or second — which should you choose? Does it matter?

## Solution

Let *a* be the chance that the person to shoot first wins the game and let *b* be the chance that the person to shoot second does, so *a*+*b*=1. Suppose that you go first. The probability *b* that your opponent wins is equal to the probability *p* that he or she survives your first shot *times* the probability *q* that he or she wins the game from then
on, after having survived the first shot. Since 5 of the 6 chambers are empty and each has an equal chance of containing the bullet, we get *p=5/6*. Once your opponent has survived the first round, he or she turns into the player to go first, with probability *a* of winning the game, so *q=a*. This gives *b*=5/6*a*. Putting this together with the fact that
*a*+*b*=1 gives *a*=6/11 and *b*=5/11. Hence you have a greater chance of winning if you take the first shot.

*This puzzle was inspired by a problem in the book Number Story, which is reviewed in this issue of Plus.*

Back to main puzzle page

## Comments

## Oops you've got this the wrong way round

The chance of being shot if you go first is

1/6+5/6×5/6×1/6+... = p

the chance if you go second is

5/6×1/6+5/6×5/6×5/6×1/6+... = 5/6 p

Thus best to go second and p = 6/11

## How about this simple answer... Does that make sense...

Since who ever goes first (say "A") has the same chance of killing the other ("B")... that is 1/6...

"A" might as well go first.. to increase the chance... and hope "B" gets killed... and "B" will never have the chance to strike back.

If "B" survives.... then it is back to square one.

So, who ever goes first have higher success rate.

Does this make sense??

## the last person to shoot will never have fired more shots

If the odds of losing are 1/6 for every shot he fired at himself, then the total odds of losing are 1/6 raised to the S (for shots fired at himself)

The last person to shoot will at times have shot one fewer than his oponent and at times shot the same. He will never have fired more shots. The number of shots fired will dictate the odds of losing. Shoot last and you won't shoot most - guaranteed.