Add new comment

Want facts and want them fast? Our Maths in a minute series explores key mathematical concepts in just a few words.
A basic introduction to the most powerful tools in science and enginnering.
As COP28, the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference, kicks off we look at how maths can help understand the climate crisis.
How do you create dramatic film out of mathematics? We find out with writer and director Timothy Lanzone.
Mathematics plays a central role in understanding how infectious diseases spread. This collection of articles looks at some basic concepts in epidemiology to help you understand this fascinating and important field, and set you up for further study.
Find out why the formula we use to work out conditional probabilities is true!
As one who majored in MAE with a minor in math and computer programming, I did find it more intuitive to treat a/bc as a/(bc). I did not until recently swap camps when I realized that in several problems where multiple operators were present, the commutative and associative properties of multiplication would go away. Not only that, if we look at another formerly ambiguous expression (for those who forget that association and commuting do not work with subtraction):
a  b + c = (a  b) + c
a  b + c ≠ a  (b + c)
Likewise:
x² = (x²)
x² ≠ (x)²
So for if nothing more than the sake of consistency:
a/bc = (a/b)(c) [where distribution still works]
a/bc ≠ a/(bc)
We all agree that the two following statements are true:
1. a/b/c = a/(bc)
2. a/b × c = (ac)/b
If a/bc = a/(bc), then a/bc = a/b/c
Which seems nonsensical to me.
But if a/bc = (ac)/b, then a/bc = a/b × c
Which to me makes more logical sense since the two sides of the equation both deal with multiplication (one implied and one expressed)
Just my $0.02