The Mandelbrot set is generated by *iteration*, which means to repeat a process over and over again. In mathematics this process is most often the application of a mathematical function. For the Mandelbrot set, the functions involved are some of the simplest imaginable: they all are what is called *quadratic polynomials* and have the form *f(x) = x ^{2} + c*,
where

*c*is a constant number. As we go along, we will specify exactly what value

*c*takes.

To iterate *x ^{2} + c*, we begin with a

*seed*for the iteration. This is a number which we write as

*x*. Applying the function

_{0}*x*to

^{2}+ c*x*yields the new number

_{0}*x*

_{1}= x_{0}^{2}+ c.Now, we iterate using the result of the previous computation as the input for the next. That is

*x*

_{2}= x_{1}^{2}+ c*x*

_{3}= x_{2}^{2}+ c*x*

_{4}= x_{3}^{2}+ c*x*

_{5}= x_{4}^{2}+ cand so forth. The list of numbers *x _{0}, x_{1}, x_{2},...* generated by this iteration has a name: it is called the

*orbit*of

*x*under iteration of

_{0}*x*.

^{2}+ cThe theory of iterated functions is motivated by questions from real life. Modelling the growth of a population of animals is an example. The size of the population after one breeding cycle depends on how many animals there are at present, so mathematical models of population growth typically consist of a function *f* in a variable *x*, where *x* represents the present
population size, and *f(x)* gives the expected population size after one breeding cycle. To work out the size of the population after any number of breeding cycles you need to iterate the function. Incidentally, the functions used in a standard model of population growth are quadratic polynomials very similar to the ones we will consider here, and this is what first motivated their
study.

This leads to one of the principal questions in this area of mathematics: what is the fate of typical orbits? Do they converge or diverge? Do they cycle or behave erratically? The Mandelbrot set is a geometric version of the answer to this question.

### Some examples

Let's begin with a few examples. Suppose we start with the constant *c = 1.* Then, if we choose the seed 0, the orbit is

*x*

_{0}= 0*x*

_{1}= 0^{2}+ 1 = 1*x*

_{2}= 1^{2}+ 1 = 2*x*

_{3}= 2^{2}+ 1 = 5*x*

_{4}= 5^{2}+ 1 = 26*x*

_{5}= 26^{2}+ 1 = BIG*x*

_{6}= BIGGER*x*

_{7}= REALLY BIG,and we see that points in this orbit get bigger and bigger — the orbit *tends to infinity.*

As another example, choose *c = 0*. Now the orbit of the seed 0 is quite different: it remains fixed for all iterations.

*x*

_{0}= 0*x*

_{1}= 0^{2}+ 0 = 0*x*

_{2}= 0^{2}+ 0 = 0*x*

_{3}= 0^{2}+ 0 = 0 .If we now choose *c = -1*, something else happens. For the seed 0, the orbit is

*x*

_{0}= 0*x*

_{1}= 0^{2}- 1 = -1*x*

_{2}= (-1)^{2}- 1 = 0*x*

_{3}= 0^{2}- 1 = -1*x*

_{4}= (-1)^{2}- 1 = 0.Here we see that the orbit bounces back and forth between 0 and -1. This is a *cycle of period 2*.

To understand the fate of orbits, it is most often easiest to proceed geometrically: a *time series plot* of the orbit often gives more information about its fate. In the plots below, we have displayed the time series for *x ^{2} + c* where

*c = -1.1, -1.3, -1.38,*and

*1.9*. In each case we have computed the orbit of 0 and marked the points in it by dots which are connected by straight line segments. Note that the fate of the orbit changes with

*c*. For

*c = -1.1*, we see that the orbit approaches a 2-cycle. For

*c = -1.3*, the orbit tends to a 4-cycle. For

*c = -1.38*, we see an 8-cycle. And when

*c = -1.9*, there is no apparent pattern for the orbit; mathematicians use the word

*chaos*for this phenomenon.

Figure 1: the orbit of 0 for iteration of *x ^{2} - 1.1* . The orbit approaches a 2-cycle.

Figure 2: the orbit of 0 for iteration of *x ^{2} - 1.3*. The orbit approaches a 4-cycle.

Figure 3: the orbit of 0 for iteration of *x ^{2} - 1.38*. The orbit approaches an 8-cycle.

Figure 4: the orbit of 0 for iteration of *x ^{2} - 1.9*. There is no apparent pattern, we see chaos.

To see additional time series plots for other values of *c*, select a *c* value from the options below:

*c = -0.65*(Tends to a fixed point)*c = -1.6*(Chaotic behaviour)*c = -1.75*(Tends to period 3)*c = -1.8*(Chaotic behaviour close to 3-cycle, sometimes called intermittency)*c = -1.85*(Chaotic behaviour)*c = 0.2*(Tends to a fixed point).

Before proceeding, let us make a seemingly obvious and uninspiring observation. Under iteration of *x ^{2} + c*, either the points in the orbit of 0 get larger and larger so that the orbit tends to infinity, or they do not. When the orbit does not go to infinity, it may behave in a variety of ways. It may be fixed or cyclic or behave chaotically, but the fundamental observation is
that there is a

*dichotomy*: sometimes the orbit goes to infinity, other times, it does not. The Mandelbrot set is a picture of precisely this dichotomy in the case where 0 is used as the seed. Thus the Mandelbrot set is a record of the fate of the orbit of 0 under iteration of

*x*: the numbers

^{2}+ c*c*are represented graphically and coloured a certain colour depending on the fate of the orbit of 0.

### Complex numbers

How, then, is the Mandelbrot set a picture in the plane, rather than on the number line on which all the *c*-values we have considered lie? The answer is, instead of considering only *real* values of *c*, we also allow *c* to be a *complex number*. If you are not familiar with complex numbers, then read this brief introduction.

Let's look at some examples of the iteration of *x ^{2} + c* when

*c*is a complex number: if

*c=i*, then the orbit of 0 under

*x*is given by

^{2}+ i*x*

_{0}= 0*x*

_{1}= 0^{2}+ i = i*x*

_{2}= i^{2}+ i = -1 + i*x*

_{3}= (-1+i)^{2}+ i = -i*x*

_{4}= (-i)^{2}+ i = -1 + i*x*

_{5}= (-1+i)^{2}+ i = -i*x*

_{6}= (-i)^{2}+ i = -1+iand we see that this orbit eventually cycles with period 2. If we change *c* to *2i*, then the orbit behaves very differently

*x*

_{0}= 0*x*

_{1}= 0^{2}+ 2i = 2i*x*

_{2}= (2i)^{2}+ 2i = -4 + 2i*x*

_{3}= (-4 + 2i)^{2}+ 2i = 12 - 14i*x*

_{4}= (12 - 14i)^{2}+ 2i = -52 - 334i*x*

_{5}= BIG (meaning far away from the point 0)*x*

_{5}= BIGGERand we see that this orbit tends to infinity in the complex plane (the numbers comprising the orbit recede further and further from the point 0, which has co-ordinates *(0,0)*). Again we make the fundamental observation that either the orbit of 0 under *x ^{2} + c* tends to infinity, or it does not.

### The Mandelbrot set

The Mandelbrot set puts some geometry into the fundamental observation above. Here is its precise definition:

*The Mandelbrot set consists of all of those (complex) c-values for which the corresponding orbit of 0 under x ^{2} + c does not escape to infinity.*

The black region is the Mandelbrot set. It is symmetric with respect to the *x*-axis in the plane, and its intersection with the *x*-axis occupies the interval from -2 to 1/4. The point 0 lies within
the *main cardioid*, and the point -1 lies within the *bulb* attached to the left of the main cardioid.

From our previous calculations, we see that *c = 0, -1, -1.1, -1.3, -1.38,* and *i* all lie in the Mandelbrot set, whereas *c = 1* and *c = 2i* do not. The Mandelbrot set is named after the mathematician Benoît Mandelbrot who was one of the first to
study it in 1980. The pictures below give you an idea of how incredibly intricate the Mandelbrot set is.

Parts of the Mandelbrot set in close-up. The two 'bulbs' shown here are directly attached to the main cardioid.

Various bulbs of the Mandelbrot set.

At this point, a natural question is: why would anyone care about the fate of the orbit of 0 under *x ^{2} + c*? Why not the orbit of

*i*? Or

*2 + 3i*? Or any other seed, for that matter? It turns out that there is a very good reason for inquiring about the fate of the orbit of 0; amazingly, the orbit of 0 somehow tells us a tremendous amount about the fate of all other orbits under

*x*. To find out more about this, read the longer version of this article,

^{2}+ c*Unveiling the Mandelbrot set*.

### About this article

This article is a shortened version of *Unveiling the Mandelbrot set*. You can find out more about complex numbers and things you can do with them in this introductory package and in our teacher package.

Robert Devaney is currently Professor of Mathematics at Boston University. His main area of research is dynamical systems, primarily complex analytic dynamics, but also including more general ideas about chaotic dynamical systems. He is the author of over one hundred research and pedagogical papers in the field of dynamical systems. He is also the (co)-author or editor of thirteen books in this area of mathematics, including a series of four books collectively called A Tool Kit of Dynamics Activities, all aimed at high school students and teachers. He has also been the "Chaos Consultant" for several theaters' presentations of Tom Stoppard's play Arcadia.

Professor Devaney has delivered over 1,300 invited lectures on dynamical systems and related topics in all 50 states in the US and in over 30 countries on six continents worldwide. He only needs Antartica to complete his goal of speaking on all continents — so if you teach at South Pole State and run some kind of seminar, give him a call!

Professor Devaney's website contains a number of interesting applets, articles and interactive papers on dynamical systems. Have a look.

## Comments

## Thank you! Very nice article

Thank you! Very nice article

## Very Helpful

Thank you so much!! This is a fantastic explanation and really helped me understand.

## I've been reading a lot of

I've been reading a lot of articles about the mandlebrot set because I wanted to make a simple program to draw it, and this may be the most clear explanation I've seen yet. Nicely done.

## Easy to understand

After reading the wikipedia version of this and not understanding a single thing I thought i might never be able to comprehend it... Then i read this article and everything makes sense.

## Mandelbrot Set

When I look at the Mandelbrot set, I can't help but think that I am looking at the face of God...

## Great explanation! Got a

Great explanation! Got a brief idea of what and how it works

## χ γ

This is so awesome! The part I don't get is how an orbital set of numbers place anything on a grid, like how does 1 2 5 26 677 458330 show a specific point? You would at least n ed an x & y right?

## Not y(x), but x(x-1)

Since this is an iterative function, you are not looking at a value y that is a result of a function of x. But like they said in the article, it is more representative of time-series data where we are only looking at the progression of x. However each value of x at an iteration i is not a function of i, but is based on the value of the x that came before it (x(x-1). So even though they did not label the "x-axis", it is really just a sequential progression of calculating the next value of x. So really, the "y-axis" is really the value of x calculated, and the "x-axis" is just the next iteration of calculating x.

## x(x-1)

look at the progression of x, while calculating it’s value at each iteration of I.

Okay, either way, the same pattern forms.

The problem is it’s a two dimensional representation.

If we were to calculate the pattern as a wave going out in all directions, then what appears to be infinite, is only the surface of a connected fractal. It’s Not flat. The surface of cone is finite, whoever the continuation of it, as well as the beginning of it, is made of this fractal shape.

## can anyone suggest a good

can anyone suggest a good book to properly study and understand fractals?

## We found this textbook very

We found this textbook very useful https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/0470013850

## Mandelbrot Set

This is, surely, one of the clearest texts for non-mathematically trained people to understand the beauty and power of the Mandelbrot Set. Ty