

What's the common ingredient?
Perhaps the first great challenge we encounter as we learn maths is to add fractions. Although often treated as such, adding fractions is no unique art — after all, what is addition? It is just a uniting of objects which share some common ingredient. With whole numbers the shared ingredient is the number 1. It presents itself so naturally that we do not need to search for it. For example,
Finding the common ingredient
What could that same ingredient be? First notice that, since they are equal to quarters and thirds, ourUsing the common ingredient

Whether it's halves or wholes: once you've found the common ingredient it's easy to add up!
respectively. So
Adding up negative numbers
Be they whole numbers or fractions, adding objects does not differ in approach once you have found a common ingredient. Yet adding positive and negative numbers together involves no little subtlety. What is the common ingredient here? In finding it, we also discover the cause of the number line's popularity when teaching arithmetic involving different signs. All numbers with signs can be thought of as displacements: distances with direction. A number's size gives a distance whilst its sign gives a direction. On the number line we can think of a positive number as an arrow (or, to use mathematical terminology, a vector) pointing a distance, which is given by the value of the number, to the right and of a negative number as an arrow pointing the distance that is given by the number to the left. The plus operation then denotes a head-to-tail attachment of arrows. Their sum is equal to the arrow which begins at the tail of the first, and ends at the head of the last, arrow added. Viewing numbers in this way removes the obstacle of differing signs. For example,
Although one of the most elementary lessons in our childhood, addition possesses a certain richness. We can bask in the knowledge that adding up is the single step that began this great journey into the modern world.
About the authors

Andrew Irving
Andrew Irving received his PhD in applied mathematics from the University of Manchester, where his research focused on analytical techniques for biological networks. His current research interests also include Markov processes and collective behaviours. He also enjoys playing guitar and writing his own songs.

Ebrahim Patel
Ebrahim Patel is a postdoctoral researcher in the Mathematical Institute at the University of Oxford. He is interested in a variety of things, including discrete dynamical systems, max-plus algebra, Premier League footballer analysis and complex systems in general.
"Aerodynamically, the bumble bee shouldn't be able to fly, but the bumble bee doesn't know it so it goes on flying anyway." (Mary Kay Ash)
Comments
Daunting Fractions?
"But how about fractions? Even pupils who have mastered the addition of whole numbers may find 3/4 + 2/3 daunting. "
No doubt this would be daunting if the student is expected to jump straight from whole numbers to fractions that have different denominators and add up to >1. But luckily for the students in my locality, the teachers would be staging the learning materials in smaller skill steps.
The pizza pictures gave me great hope for this article; my students are immediately engaged and quickly become highly skilled when we draw and calculate 1/4 + 1/4 pizza makes 2/4 pizza which, hey presto is the same as 1/2 pizza. This fractions stuff is really easy and interesting - insight and great joy!
The rest of the explanation, via algebra and Greek letters, frustrated me. Yes, it follows a logical thought process, but no additional enlightenment, more an intellectual investigation for the benefit of the writers.
But then the extension of the idea to 'Adding up negative numbers'. Great, I thought, I'm always looking for concrete examples to help with the concept of ' +- = - ' etc.
Where does the adding 'up' in the heading fit within the practice of precision in formulating mathematical sentences? So the popularity of a number line when working with adding negative numbers can be explained using vectors, displacement, head-to-tail attachment of arrows?
Aah - of course! Now how can I fit 'displacement, vectors and head-to-tail atachment' in the the teaching programme before 'adding negative numbers'? Perhaps that's how the visiting teachers from Shanghai do it?
Using words
Interestingly, a TED talk came out after this article was published which shared some of the same ideas. See the link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6yixyiJcos