Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Popular topics and tags

    Shapes

    • Geometry
    • Vectors and matrices
    • Topology
    • Networks and graph theory
    • Fractals

    Numbers

    • Number theory
    • Arithmetic
    • Prime numbers
    • Fermat's last theorem
    • Cryptography

    Computing and information

    • Quantum computing
    • Complexity
    • Information theory
    • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
    • Algorithm

    Data and probability

    • Statistics
    • Probability and uncertainty
    • Randomness

    Abstract structures

    • Symmetry
    • Algebra and group theory
    • Vectors and matrices

    Physics

    • Fluid dynamics
    • Quantum physics
    • General relativity, gravity and black holes
    • Entropy and thermodynamics
    • String theory and quantum gravity

    Arts, humanities and sport

    • History and philosophy of mathematics
    • Art and Music
    • Language
    • Sport

    Logic, proof and strategy

    • Logic
    • Proof
    • Game theory

    Calculus and analysis

    • Differential equations
    • Calculus

    Towards applications

    • Mathematical modelling
    • Dynamical systems and Chaos

    Applications

    • Medicine and health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biology
    • Economics and finance
    • Engineering and architecture
    • Weather forecasting
    • Climate change

    Understanding of mathematics

    • Public understanding of mathematics
    • Education

    Get your maths quickly

    • Maths in a minute

    Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • Audiences

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • How to resolve the Premier League

    by
    Salim Neil Khan
    1 May, 2020
    Football and virus

    Due to COVID-19 football leagues have been suspended.

    Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, football leagues around the world have been suspended and for many there is the threat that the season will not be completed. This has raised the spectre of deciding the positions of teams in the league by points per game (PPG). Indeed in Scotland this appears to be a strong possibility. However, in its conventional form, using PPG could be considered an unfair method, as some teams have played "easier" opponents than others and some teams have played more home games than others. This article suggests an adjustment to PPG to account for these factors.

    Looking at the current English Premier League table below, PPG has been determined using the standard calculation

    $$PPG=\frac{\mbox{Number of points}}{\mbox{Number of games played}}.$$
    Premier League table at suspension on March 9, 2020.
    PositionTeamGames playedGoal differencePointsPPG
    1Liverpool2945822.828
    2Man City2837572.036
    3Leicester2930531.828
    4Chelsea2912481.655
    5Man Utd2914451.552
    6Wolves297431.483
    7Sheffield Utd285431.536
    8Tottenham297411.414
    9Arsenal284401.429
    10Burnley29-6391.345
    11Crystal Palace29-6391.345
    12Everton29-9371.276
    13Newcastle29-16351.207
    14Southampton29-17341.172
    15Brighton29-8291.000
    16West Ham29-15270.931
    17Watford29-17270.931
    18Bournemouth29-18270.931
    19Aston Villa28-22250.893
    20Norwich29-27210.724

    We can see that using PPG would change the positions very little from using points. The only difference would be that Sheffield Utd would swap places with Wolves, and Arsenal would swap with Tottenham.

    Nevertheless, if we look at the relegation scrap specifically, it is very close so we need to be confident that PPG accurately represents the teams' relative performances so far. This is debatable. There are 2 major concerns:

    1. Some teams will have played easier opponents than others.
      For example, Brighton were due to play Liverpool, Man City and Man Utd (the 1st, 2nd, and 5th highest teams) within their nine remaining games. This highlights that their PPG score so far was probably gained playing against relatively easier opponents than those their relegation rivals faced, and hence it could be argued that their PPG should be scaled down to reflect this.
    2. Some teams have played fewer home games than others.
      For example, Aston Villa have only played 13 home games whereas their relegation rivals have all played 14. As teams tend to get more points on average at home than away, the PPG calculation should be adjusted to allow for this.

    Home and away

    To accommodate these factors it is important to look at home and away results separately. In the table below PPGH stands for points per home game and PPGA for points per away game.

    Premier League home and away PPG.
    HomeAway
    TeamPlayedPointsPPGHPlayedPointsPPGA
    Liverpool15453.00014372.643
    Man City13292.32115281.867
    Leicester15302.00014231.643
    Chelsea15241.60014241.714
    Man Utd15291.93314161.143
    Wolves15221.46714211.500
    Sheffield Utd15241.60013191.462
    Tottenham14261.85715151.000
    Arsenal15261.73313141.077
    Burnley15231.53314161.143
    Crystal Palace15221.46714171.214
    Everton14251.78615120.800
    Newcastle14211.50015140.933
    Southampton15140.93314201.429
    Brighton14181.28615110.733
    West Ham14151.07115120.800
    Watford14171.21415100.667
    Bournemouth14171.21415100.667
    Aston Villa13171.3081580.533
    Norwich14151.0711560.400

    One way of obtaining a single number for each team would be to take the average of each team's PPGH and PPGA. However, that would not take account of the fact that some teams have had an easier ride so far than others. So let's see how we can adjust the PPGH and PPGA for each team to take this difference into account.

    Adjusted home values

    First let's consider the points per home game (PPGH). We can calculate an adjusted value (Adj PPGH) for a particular team, call it team T, by considering the strength of the opponents which team T has played at home. First we define the home opponents factor (FH) for team T as the relative strength of the opponents team T played at home:

    $$F_H = \frac{\mbox{Average $PPG_A$ over opponents $T$ played at home} }{\mbox{Average $PPG_A$ over all $T$'s opponents}}.$$

    (Note that if team T played an opponent at home, then that opponent played away — this is why PPGA appears in the numerator and denominator of the expression above.)

    We now define the adjusted PPGH for team T as

    $$Adj \;\;PPG_H = PPG_H \times F_H.$$

    This adjusted PPGH should better represent a team's performance than PPG does.

    Let's illustrate this for Brighton, who have played all teams at home except for Liverpool, Man City, Man Utd, Arsenal, and Newcastle. In this case we have $$\mbox{Average $PPG_A$ over opponents $T$ played at home}=\frac{1.643+1.714+1.500+...}{14}=1.069$$ and $$\mbox{Average $PPG_A$ over all $T$'s opponents}=\frac{2.643+1.867+1.643+...}{19}=1.191.$$ Then $$F_H=\frac{1.069}{1.191}=0.898.$$ This gives $$Adj \;\;PPG_H =1.286\times 0.898 = 1.154.$$

    Because Brighton have played easier opponents at home on average than the other teams (i.e. their FH1), their PPGH has effectively been scaled down.

    Doing similar calculations for the other five teams in the relegation battle, we can obtain each team's adjusted PPGH for its home games:

    Adjusted PPG for the home games of the teams at the foot of the Premier League table.
    TeamPlayedPointsPPGHFHAdj PPGH
    Brighton14181.2860.8981.154
    West Ham14151.0711.0781.155
    Watford14171.2140.9821.192
    Bournemouth14171.2140.9851.196
    Aston Villa13171.3080.9641.261
    Norwich14151.0711.0671.143

    Adjusted away values

    Repeating this process for the away results, the away opponents factor (FA) of a team T is the relative strength of the opponents team T played away:

    $$F_A = \frac{\mbox{Average $PPG_H$ over opponents $T$ played away} }{\mbox{Average $PPG_H$ over all $T$'s opponents}},$$ Then $$Adj \;\;PPG_A = PPG_A \times F_A.$$
    Adjusted PPG for the away games of the teams at the foot of the Premier League table.
    TeamPlayedPointsPPGAFAAdj PPGA
    Brighton15110.7331.0370.760
    West Ham15120.8001.0040.804
    Watford15100.6671.0210.681
    Bournemouth15100.6670.9600.640
    Aston Villa1580.5330.9610.513
    Norwich1560.4000.9870.395

    Overall adjusted PPG

    We can then obtain the overall adjusted PPG for each team by finding the average of their home value and away value:

    $$Adj\;\;PPG=\frac{Adj\;\;PPG_H+Adj\;\;PPG_A}{2}.$$

    By utilising averages, we are allowing for teams to have played different numbers of home or away games from each other, which the standard PPG doesn't do.

    Using the Adj PPG values, the bottom of the final Premier League table would be as follows:

    Final Premier League positions using the adjusted PPG.
    PositionTeamPlayedAdj PPGPPGPoints
    15West Ham290.9790.93127
    16Brighton290.9571.00029
    17Watford290.9370.93127
    18Bournemouth290.9180.93127
    19Aston Villa280.8870.89325
    20Norwich290.7690.72421

    As it turns out, in this scenario the same 3 three teams would be relegated using Adj PPG as the original PPG. Aston Villa's increase due to their extra home game is wiped out by their difficult run-in. However, Brighton's PPG has reduced considerably due to their easier past opponents, resulting in dropping a place. This would have serious implications had they been 17th beforehand.

    In conclusion, I suggest that the adjusted PPG would be a fairer way than the standard PPG for assessing the performance of teams in a curtailed season. If the Scottish FA or any other body decide to implement a PPG system, they and the clubs should carefully look at its shortcomings and consider the option of using an adjusted PPG. However, I think the very best solution would be to complete the fixtures when it becomes possible to play again, whenever that may be.


    Slim Khan

    About the author

    Slim Khan is a Teaching Fellow at Warwick University, and is particularly interested in mathematics and statistics related to games and sports.

    • Log in or register to post comments

    Read more about...

    mathematics in sport
    football

    Our Podcast: Maths on the Move

    Our Maths on the Move podcast brings you the latest news from the world of maths, plus interviews and discussions with leading mathematicians and scientists about the maths that is changing our lives.

    Apple Podcasts
    Spotify
    Podbean

    Plus delivered to you

    Keep up to date with Plus by subscribing to our newsletter or following Plus on X or Bluesky.

    University of Cambridge logo

    Plus is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
    Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

    Terms