Add new comment

Who's watching: Context is everything

Quantum mechanics appears to say that the world at its smallest scales is fuzzy. Little particles, such as electrons, don't have precise locations in space and they don't travel at well-defined speeds, for example. It's only when we look, that is, when we make a measurement, that reality somehow "snaps" into place and particles are found sitting at well-defined places and moving with well-defined speeds. The exact values of properties like location and speed appear to be chosen at random.

Jeremy Butterfield, philosopher of physics at the University of Cambridge, explains contextuality.

The predictions of quantum mechanics have been tested endlessly in experiments and they hold true, but could it be that the theory simply isn't complete? Could there be hidden variables — some extra information — which, if we include them, give us a theory that isn't random or fuzzy? The answer is yes, but not without a price. Such a theory will always exhibit something called contextuality: the outcome of a measurement will be heavily distorted by your experimental set-up, so try as you might, you can never be an impartial observer. The following articles and video explore this concept of contextuality and related topics.

Contextuality: The most quantum thing — What exactly is contextually and how do we know that we can't get away from it?

Riding the pilot wave — Pilot wave theory is an extension of quantum mechanics that isn't random or fuzzy: there's a sharply defined reality that's there even when we're not looking. However, pilot wave theory is contextual. Here is a quick introduction.

Colouring by numbers: The Kochen-Specker theorem — A quick look at the theorem that delivers contextuality. Its proof can be thought of as a colouring problem!

The following articles first appeared on the FQXi website.

Quantum in context — Contextuality could provide the magic needed for quantum computation, and perhaps even open the door to time travel.

The quantum reality paradox — What does contextually mean for real-life measurements and what does it have to do with religious questions?

FQXi logo

This package is part of our Who's watching? The physics of observers project, run in collaboration with FQXi. Click here to see more articles and videos about questions to do with observers in physics.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Want facts and want them fast? Our Maths in a minute series explores key mathematical concepts in just a few words.

  • What do chocolate and mayonnaise have in common? It's maths! Find out how in this podcast featuring engineer Valerie Pinfield.

  • Is it possible to write unique music with the limited quantity of notes and chords available? We ask musician Oli Freke!

  • How can maths help to understand the Southern Ocean, a vital component of the Earth's climate system?

  • Was the mathematical modelling projecting the course of the pandemic too pessimistic, or were the projections justified? Matt Keeling tells our colleagues from SBIDER about the COVID models that fed into public policy.

  • PhD student Daniel Kreuter tells us about his work on the BloodCounts! project, which uses maths to make optimal use of the billions of blood tests performed every year around the globe.