Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

      Popular topics and tags

      Shapes

      • Geometry
      • Vectors and matrices
      • Topology
      • Networks and graph theory
      • Fractals

      Numbers

      • Number theory
      • Arithmetic
      • Prime numbers
      • Fermat's last theorem
      • Cryptography

      Computing and information

      • Quantum computing
      • Complexity
      • Information theory
      • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
      • Algorithm

      Data and probability

      • Statistics
      • Probability and uncertainty
      • Randomness

      Abstract structures

      • Symmetry
      • Algebra and group theory
      • Vectors and matrices

      Physics

      • Fluid dynamics
      • Quantum physics
      • General relativity, gravity and black holes
      • Entropy and thermodynamics
      • String theory and quantum gravity

      Arts, humanities and sport

      • History and philosophy of mathematics
      • Art and Music
      • Language
      • Sport

      Logic, proof and strategy

      • Logic
      • Proof
      • Game theory

      Calculus and analysis

      • Differential equations
      • Calculus

      Towards applications

      • Mathematical modelling
      • Dynamical systems and Chaos

      Applications

      • Medicine and health
      • Epidemiology
      • Biology
      • Economics and finance
      • Engineering and architecture
      • Weather forecasting
      • Climate change

      Understanding of mathematics

      • Public understanding of mathematics
      • Education

      Get your maths quickly

      • Maths in a minute

      Main menu

    • Home
    • Articles
    • Collections
    • Podcasts
    • Maths in a minute
    • Puzzles
    • Videos
    • Topics and tags
    • Audiences

      • cat icon
        Curiosity
      • newspaper icon
        Media
      • graduation icon
        Education
      • briefcase icon
        Policy

      Secondary menu

    • My list
    • About Plus
    • Sponsors
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us
    • Log in
    • Outer space: Racing certainties

      John D. Barrow
      1 January, 2005
      1 comments
      January 2005

      Horse races

      A few months ago I saw a TV crime drama that involved a plan to defraud bookmakers by nobbling the favourite for a race. The drama centred around other events and the basis for the betting fraud was never explained. What might have been going on?

      Suppose that you have a race where there are published odds on the competitors of a1 to 1, a2 to 1, a3 to 1, and so on for any number, N, of runners. For example, if the odds are 5 to 4 then we express that as an ai of 5/4 to 1. Now if we lay bets on all of the N runners in proportion to the odds so that we bet a fraction 1/(ai+1) of the total stake money on the runner with odds of ai to 1 then we will always show a profit so long as the odds satisfy the inequality Q=∑i=1N1ai+1<1, and if Q is less than 1 then our winnings will be at least equal to W=[ 1Q−1]×our total stake.

      More horse races
      Let's look at some examples. Suppose there are four runners and the odds for each are 6 to 1, 7 to 2, 2 to 1 and 8 to 1. Then we have a1=6,a2=7/2,a3=2 and a4=8 and Q=17+29+13+19=5163<1 and so by betting our stake money with 1/7 on runner 1, 2/9 on runner 2, 1/3 on runner 3, and 1/9 on runner 4 we will win at least 51/63 of the money we staked (and of course we get our stake money back as well).

      However, suppose that in the next race the odds on the four runners are 3 to 1, 7 to 1, 3 to 2 and 1 to 1 (ie evens). Now we see that we have Q=14+18+25+12=5140>1 and there is no way that we can guarantee a positive return. Generally, we can see that if there is a large field of runners (N is big) there is is likely to be a better chance of Q being greater than 1. But large N doesn't guarantee Q>1. Pick each of the odds by the formula ai=i(i+2)−1 and you can get Q=3/4 and a healthy 30\% return even when N is infinite!

      But let's return to the TV programme. How is the situation changed if we know ahead of the race that the favourite in our Q>1 example will not be a contender because he has been doped?

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Comments

      Anonymous

      24 July 2015

      Permalink

      Can you please provide some examples on the use of the formula ai = i ( i +2 ) - 1 for selecting the odds so as to show a profit.

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Read more about...

      gambling
      outerspace
      odds
      horse racing
      University of Cambridge logo

      Plus Magazine is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
      Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

      Terms