Outer space: Racing certainties

John D. Barrow Share this page
January 2005

Horse races

A few months ago I saw a TV crime drama that involved a plan to defraud bookmakers by nobbling the favourite for a race. The drama centred around other events and the basis for the betting fraud was never explained. What might have been going on?

Suppose that you have a race where there are published odds on the competitors of $a_{1}$ to 1, $a_{2}$ to 1, $a_{3}$ to 1, and so on for any number, $N$, of runners. For example, if the odds are 5 to 4 then we express that as an $a_{i}$ of 5/4 to 1. Now if we lay bets on all of the $N$ runners in proportion to the odds so that we bet a fraction $1/(a_{i}+1)$ of the total stake money on the runner with odds of $a_{i}$ to 1 then we will always show a profit so long as the odds satisfy the inequality

  \[  Q=\sum _{i=1}^{N}\frac{1}{a_{i}+1}<1,  \]    
and if $Q$ is less than $1$ then our winnings will be at least equal to
  \[  W=\left[ \frac{\  1}{Q}-1\right] \times \mbox{our total stake}.  \]    

More horse races
Let's look at some examples. Suppose there are four runners and the odds for each are 6 to 1, 7 to 2, 2 to 1 and 8 to 1. Then we have $a_{1}=6,a_{2}=7/2,a_{3}=2$ and $a_{4}=8$ and
  \[  Q=\frac{1}{7}+\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{9}=\frac{51}{63}<1  \]    
and so by betting our stake money with 1/7 on runner 1, 2/9 on runner 2, 1/3 on runner 3, and 1/9 on runner 4 we will win at least 51/63 of the money we staked (and of course we get our stake money back as well).

However, suppose that in the next race the odds on the four runners are 3 to 1, 7 to 1, 3 to 2 and 1 to 1 (ie evens). Now we see that we have

  \[  Q=\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{2}{5}+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{51}{40}>1  \]    
and there is no way that we can guarantee a positive return. Generally, we can see that if there is a large field of runners ($N$ is big) there is is likely to be a better chance of $Q$ being greater than 1. But large $N$ doesn't guarantee $Q>1$. Pick each of the odds by the formula $a_{i}=i(i+2)-1$ and you can get $Q=3/4$ and a healthy 30% return even when $N$ is infinite!

But let's return to the TV programme. How is the situation changed if we know ahead of the race that the favourite in our $Q>1$ example will not be a contender because he has been doped?

Read more about...



Can you please provide some examples on the use of the formula ai = i ( i +2 ) - 1 for selecting the odds so as to show a profit.

  • Want facts and want them fast? Our Maths in a minute series explores key mathematical concepts in just a few words.

  • The BloodCounts! project is gearing up towards one of the largest-scale applications yet of machine learning in medicine and healthcare.

  • What do chocolate and mayonnaise have in common? It's maths! Find out how in this podcast featuring engineer Valerie Pinfield.

  • Is it possible to write unique music with the limited quantity of notes and chords available? We ask musician Oli Freke!

  • How can maths help to understand the Southern Ocean, a vital component of the Earth's climate system?

  • Was the mathematical modelling projecting the course of the pandemic too pessimistic, or were the projections justified? Matt Keeling tells our colleagues from SBIDER about the COVID models that fed into public policy.