Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

      Popular topics and tags

      Shapes

      • Geometry
      • Vectors and matrices
      • Topology
      • Networks and graph theory
      • Fractals

      Numbers

      • Number theory
      • Arithmetic
      • Prime numbers
      • Fermat's last theorem
      • Cryptography

      Computing and information

      • Quantum computing
      • Complexity
      • Information theory
      • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
      • Algorithm

      Data and probability

      • Statistics
      • Probability and uncertainty
      • Randomness

      Abstract structures

      • Symmetry
      • Algebra and group theory
      • Vectors and matrices

      Physics

      • Fluid dynamics
      • Quantum physics
      • General relativity, gravity and black holes
      • Entropy and thermodynamics
      • String theory and quantum gravity

      Arts, humanities and sport

      • History and philosophy of mathematics
      • Art and Music
      • Language
      • Sport

      Logic, proof and strategy

      • Logic
      • Proof
      • Game theory

      Calculus and analysis

      • Differential equations
      • Calculus

      Towards applications

      • Mathematical modelling
      • Dynamical systems and Chaos

      Applications

      • Medicine and health
      • Epidemiology
      • Biology
      • Economics and finance
      • Engineering and architecture
      • Weather forecasting
      • Climate change

      Understanding of mathematics

      • Public understanding of mathematics
      • Education

      Get your maths quickly

      • Maths in a minute

      Main menu

    • Home
    • Articles
    • Collections
    • Podcasts
    • Maths in a minute
    • Puzzles
    • Videos
    • Topics and tags
    • Audiences

      • cat icon
        Curiosity
      • newspaper icon
        Media
      • graduation icon
        Education
      • briefcase icon
        Policy

      Secondary menu

    • My list
    • About Plus
    • Sponsors
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us
    • Log in
    • Perfectly odd

      Kyrie Johnson
      the Plus Team
      5 February, 2020
      Are there odd  perfect numbers?

      Do odd perfect numbers exist?

      A perfect number is a whole number which equals the sum of its proper divisors: for example, 6 is divisible by 2,3 and 1 and is also equal to the sum 1+2+3=6. Similarly, 28 is divisible by 1,2,4,7 and 14 and equal to 1+2+4+7+14=28.

      Perfect numbers are easy to define, but finding examples of them is a different matter: although mathematicians have been looking for them since the time of the ancient Greeks, they have only managed to find 51 so far (you can find out more about the history of perfect numbers here).

      One thing all the known perfect numbers have in common is that they are even. But what about odd perfect numbers? Do they exist, and if yes, what are they?

      What would odd perfect numbers look like?

      In the eighteenth century the legendary mathematician Leonhard Euler showed that an odd perfect number n, if it exists, must look like

      n=pj(m2), where the numbers p, j and m satisfy the following restrictions:

      • The number m is an odd integer,
      • The number p is a prime number and of the form 4k+1 for some positive integer k,
      • The number j is also of the form 4k+1 for some positive integer k (though it doesn't need to be prime).

      Let's illustrate this with an example. The first prime number of the form p=4k+1 is 5=4×1+1. For the exponent j we can choose j=5=1×4+1 to get pj=55=3125. Choosing m=3 for the odd number m gives us n=5532=28125 as a candidate for an odd perfect number.

      We can see that even if we choose small values for p,j and m, the resulting candidate n is already quite large. Indeed, Euler's result means that there are only eleven odd perfect number candidates under 100, namely 5,13,17,33,37,41,45,53,73,89,and97.

      More restrictions

      We can whittle this list down further using a result proved in 1953, two full centuries after Euler, by the French mathematician Jacques Touchard. He showed that every odd perfect number n must also be of the form

      n=12k+1orn=36k+9, where k as before is a positive integer.

      In our list of eleven numbers above, this only applies to four, namely

      13=1×12+137=3×12+145=1×36+997=8×12+1

      Is any of these four numbers perfect? You can check for yourself that the answer is no. We have just proved that there are no odd perfect numbers under 100. Over the centuries mathematicians have come up with a number of other restrictions on the form any odd perfect numbers must take (you can see a list here). These don't help us prove that odd perfect numbers do or don't exist, but at least they help us to rule out candidates.

      How big are odd perfect numbers?

      Calculations like the ones above can be done with just your brain, paper and a pencil, but once you have a computer at your disposal you can go much, much further in eliminating odd perfect number candidates. This is just what mathematicians have done, using mathematical results combined with clever computer algorithms. The table below illustrates the advances that have been made over the last few decades.

      YearThere's no odd perfect number under
      19571020
      19731050
      198910160
      199110300
      2012101500

      Note that the last result means that any odd perfect number, if it exists, must have at least 1500 digits. That's absolutely huge and has led mathematicians to suspect that odd perfect numbers probably don't exist at all. But a suspicion isn't a proof, no matter how much evidence counts in its favour. Until mathematicians develop the tools required for a proof, the mystery of odd perfect numbers remains open.


      Kyrie Johnson

      About the author

      Kyrie Johnson is a college student who will be starting a doctorate programme in maths next fall. They are particularly fond of number theory because they adore how some of its most accessible problem statements — such as perfect numbers, Fermat's Last theorem, and the distribution of prime numbers — require intricate and complex solutions. When they're not thinking about number theory, they like rock climbing, listening to music, and playing games.

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Read more about...

      perfect number
      number theory
      odd perfect number
      University of Cambridge logo

      Plus Magazine is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
      Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

      Terms