Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Popular topics and tags

    Shapes

    • Geometry
    • Vectors and matrices
    • Topology
    • Networks and graph theory
    • Fractals

    Numbers

    • Number theory
    • Arithmetic
    • Prime numbers
    • Fermat's last theorem
    • Cryptography

    Computing and information

    • Quantum computing
    • Complexity
    • Information theory
    • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
    • Algorithm

    Data and probability

    • Statistics
    • Probability and uncertainty
    • Randomness

    Abstract structures

    • Symmetry
    • Algebra and group theory
    • Vectors and matrices

    Physics

    • Fluid dynamics
    • Quantum physics
    • General relativity, gravity and black holes
    • Entropy and thermodynamics
    • String theory and quantum gravity

    Arts, humanities and sport

    • History and philosophy of mathematics
    • Art and Music
    • Language
    • Sport

    Logic, proof and strategy

    • Logic
    • Proof
    • Game theory

    Calculus and analysis

    • Differential equations
    • Calculus

    Towards applications

    • Mathematical modelling
    • Dynamical systems and Chaos

    Applications

    • Medicine and health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biology
    • Economics and finance
    • Engineering and architecture
    • Weather forecasting
    • Climate change

    Understanding of mathematics

    • Public understanding of mathematics
    • Education

    Get your maths quickly

    • Maths in a minute

    Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • Audiences

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Perfectly odd

    by
    Kyrie Johnson
    the Plus Team
    5 February, 2020
    Are there odd  perfect numbers?

    Do odd perfect numbers exist?

    A perfect number is a whole number which equals the sum of its proper divisors: for example, $6$ is divisible by $2,3$ and $1$ and is also equal to the sum $1+2+3=6.$ Similarly, $28$ is divisible by $1,2,4,7$ and $14$ and equal to $1+2+4+7+14=28.$

    Perfect numbers are easy to define, but finding examples of them is a different matter: although mathematicians have been looking for them since the time of the ancient Greeks, they have only managed to find 51 so far (you can find out more about the history of perfect numbers here).

    One thing all the known perfect numbers have in common is that they are even. But what about odd perfect numbers? Do they exist, and if yes, what are they?

    What would odd perfect numbers look like?

    In the eighteenth century the legendary mathematician Leonhard Euler showed that an odd perfect number $n,$ if it exists, must look like

    $$n=p^j(m^2),$$ where the numbers $p$, $j$ and $m$ satisfy the following restrictions:

    • The number $m$ is an odd integer,
    • The number $p$ is a prime number and of the form $4k+1$ for some positive integer $k$,
    • The number $j$ is also of the form $4k+1$ for some positive integer $k$ (though it doesn't need to be prime).

    Let's illustrate this with an example. The first prime number of the form $$p=4k+1$$ is $$5= 4\times 1 +1.$$ For the exponent $j$ we can choose $$j=5=1\times 4+1$$ to get $$p^j=5^5=3125.$$ Choosing $m=3$ for the odd number $m$ gives us $$n=5^5 3^2=28125$$ as a candidate for an odd perfect number.

    We can see that even if we choose small values for $p,j$ and $m$, the resulting candidate $n$ is already quite large. Indeed, Euler's result means that there are only eleven odd perfect number candidates under $100$, namely $$5,13,17,33,37,41,45,53,73,89,\;\;\mbox{and}\;\;97.$$

    More restrictions

    We can whittle this list down further using a result proved in 1953, two full centuries after Euler, by the French mathematician Jacques Touchard. He showed that every odd perfect number $n$ must also be of the form

    $$n=12k + 1 \;\;\;\mbox{or} \;\;\;n=36k + 9,$$ where $k$ as before is a positive integer.

    In our list of eleven numbers above, this only applies to four, namely

    \begin{eqnarray*}13&=&1 \times 12+1 \\ 37 &=& 3 \times 12 +1 \\ 45&=&1 \times 36+9\\ 97&=&8\times 12+1 \\\end{eqnarray*}

    Is any of these four numbers perfect? You can check for yourself that the answer is no. We have just proved that there are no odd perfect numbers under $100.$ Over the centuries mathematicians have come up with a number of other restrictions on the form any odd perfect numbers must take (you can see a list here). These don't help us prove that odd perfect numbers do or don't exist, but at least they help us to rule out candidates.

    How big are odd perfect numbers?

    Calculations like the ones above can be done with just your brain, paper and a pencil, but once you have a computer at your disposal you can go much, much further in eliminating odd perfect number candidates. This is just what mathematicians have done, using mathematical results combined with clever computer algorithms. The table below illustrates the advances that have been made over the last few decades.

    YearThere's no odd perfect number under
    1957$10^{20}$
    1973$10^{50}$
    1989$10^{160}$
    1991$10^{300}$
    2012$10^{1500}$

    Note that the last result means that any odd perfect number, if it exists, must have at least $1500$ digits. That's absolutely huge and has led mathematicians to suspect that odd perfect numbers probably don't exist at all. But a suspicion isn't a proof, no matter how much evidence counts in its favour. Until mathematicians develop the tools required for a proof, the mystery of odd perfect numbers remains open.


    Kyrie Johnson

    About the author

    Kyrie Johnson is a college student who will be starting a doctorate programme in maths next fall. They are particularly fond of number theory because they adore how some of its most accessible problem statements — such as perfect numbers, Fermat's Last theorem, and the distribution of prime numbers — require intricate and complex solutions. When they're not thinking about number theory, they like rock climbing, listening to music, and playing games.

    • Log in or register to post comments

    Read more about...

    perfect number
    number theory
    odd perfect number

    Our Podcast: Maths on the Move

    Our Maths on the Move podcast brings you the latest news from the world of maths, plus interviews and discussions with leading mathematicians and scientists about the maths that is changing our lives.

    Apple Podcasts
    Spotify
    Podbean

    Plus delivered to you

    Keep up to date with Plus by subscribing to our newsletter or following Plus on X or Bluesky.

    University of Cambridge logo

    Plus is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
    Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

    Terms