Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Popular topics and tags

    Shapes

    • Geometry
    • Vectors and matrices
    • Topology
    • Networks and graph theory
    • Fractals

    Numbers

    • Number theory
    • Arithmetic
    • Prime numbers
    • Fermat's last theorem
    • Cryptography

    Computing and information

    • Quantum computing
    • Complexity
    • Information theory
    • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
    • Algorithm

    Data and probability

    • Statistics
    • Probability and uncertainty
    • Randomness

    Abstract structures

    • Symmetry
    • Algebra and group theory
    • Vectors and matrices

    Physics

    • Fluid dynamics
    • Quantum physics
    • General relativity, gravity and black holes
    • Entropy and thermodynamics
    • String theory and quantum gravity

    Arts, humanities and sport

    • History and philosophy of mathematics
    • Art and Music
    • Language
    • Sport

    Logic, proof and strategy

    • Logic
    • Proof
    • Game theory

    Calculus and analysis

    • Differential equations
    • Calculus

    Towards applications

    • Mathematical modelling
    • Dynamical systems and Chaos

    Applications

    • Medicine and health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biology
    • Economics and finance
    • Engineering and architecture
    • Weather forecasting
    • Climate change

    Understanding of mathematics

    • Public understanding of mathematics
    • Education

    Get your maths quickly

    • Maths in a minute

    Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • Audiences

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Football: Was points per game fair?

    by
    Salim Neil Khan
    5 August, 2020

    Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many football leagues around the world had to finish their seasons early with fixtures unfulfilled. Some of those leagues abandoned their seasons altogether, ruling them null and void, resulting in no promotions nor relegations. Alternatively a number of curtailed leagues decided to award final placings based on results that had been achieved so far. In those cases, the average points per game (PPG) was used as the deciding measure.

    Football as virus

    Due to COVID-19 football leagues had to be suspended.

    However, in an earlier article, I suggested that PPG may not be a fair performance measure as it didn't take into account the following two important factors. Firstly the number of home and away games played should be considered. When included, this gives us a new measure which has since been called weighted points per game (WPPG) in many quarters. Secondly, crucially we should consider the difficulty of opponents that teams had played so far. I proposed an alternative measure, adjusted points per game (Adj PPG) which accounted for both these factors.

    Some leagues, such as the Premier League, managed to complete their remaining fixtures. Hence in this article I use the Premier League results to compare what actually happened with what was predicted using PPG, WPPG and Adj PPG, and determine which of those three was the most accurate, or fairest.

    Qualification for Europe and relegation

    Below is the final Premier League table and the tables which show what the result would have been if Adj PPG, PPG, or WPPG had been used.

    Final Premier League table, Adj PPG table, PPG table, and WPPG table.
    Position
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    TeamPoints
    Liverpool99
    Man City81
    Man Utd66
    Chelsea66
    Leicester62
    Tottenham59
    Wolves 59
    Arsenal56
    Sheffield Utd54
    Burnley54
    Southampton52
    Everton49
    Newcastle 44
    Crystal Palace43
    Brighton41
    West Ham39
    Aston Villa35
    Bournemouth34
    Watford34
    Norwich21
    TeamAdj PPG
    Liverpool2.740
    Man City2.091
    Leicester1.824
    Chelsea1.644
    Man Utd1.554
    Wolves 1.548
    Sheffield Utd 1.524
    Tottenham1.464
    Arsenal 1.383
    Burnley1.330
    Crystal Palace1.299
    Everton1.246
    Newcastle 1.201
    Southampton1.195
    West Ham0.979
    Brighton0.957
    Watford0.937
    Bournemouth0.918
    Aston Villa0.873
    Norwich0.769
    TeamPPG
    Liverpool2.828
    Man City2.036
    Leicester1.828
    Chelsea1.655
    Man Utd1.552
    Sheffield Utd 1.536
    Wolves1.483
    Arsenal1.429
    Tottenham1.414
    Burnley1.345
    Crystal Palace1.345
    Everton1.276
    Newcastle 1.207
    Southampton1.172
    Brighton1.000
    West Ham0.931
    Watford0.931
    Bournemouth0.931
    Aston Villa0.893
    Norwich0.724
    TeamWPPG
    Liverpool2.821
    Man City2.049
    Leicester1.821
    Chelsea1.657
    Man Utd1.538
    Sheffield Utd 1.531
    Wolves1.483
    Tottenham1.429
    Arsenal1.405
    Crystal Palace1.340
    Burnley1.338
    Everton1.293
    Newcastle 1.217
    Southampton1.181
    Brighton1.010
    Watford0.940
    Bournemouth0.940
    West Ham0.936
    Aston Villa0.921
    Norwich0.736

    Undoubtedly the most important outcomes to examine are the top four positions (i.e. those who qualified for the Champions League), the 5th and 6th positions (i.e. those who qualified for the Europa League), and the bottom 3 (i.e. those who were relegated).

    We can see from the table above that all three measures forecasted exactly the same top five positions. They were successful in predicting which teams would make up the top five, but placed Leicester (who finished 5th) and Man Utd (who finished 3rd) the wrong way around. The final Europa League place was taken by Tottenham, but this was not predicted by any of the measures.

    Regarding the bottom three, Adj PPG and PPG both correctly predicted two out of the three teams that were relegated, namely Norwich and Bournemouth, whereas WPPG only predicted 1 correctly, erroneously projecting West Ham for the drop.

    Based on these simple indicators, this suggests that Adj PPG and PPG would have been equally appropriate measures, with WPPG less so.

    Points Comparison

    More importantly, it would be informative to assess the overall predictive accuracy for the whole table for each of the three measures. One way to do this is to compare the actual final points for all the teams with the points predicted by each measure.

    By multiplying the values from the table above by the number of games played, 38, we can obtain the predicted number of points for each team. These are shown in the table below along with their differences from the actual points.

    Premier League teams’ final points and their predicted points according to Adj PPG, PPG, and WPPG.
    TeamsActual points Predicted points
    Adj PPGPPGWPPG
    Arsenal5652.654.353.4
    Aston Villa3533.233.935.0
    Bournemouth3434.935.435.7
    Brighton4136.438.038.4
    Burnley5450.551.150.8
    Chelsea6662.562.963.0
    Crystal Palace4349.451.150.9
    Everton4947.348.549.1
    Leicester6269.369.569.2
    Liverpool99104.1107.5107.2
    Man City8179.577.477.9
    Man Utd6659.159.058.4
    Newcastle4445.645.946.2
    Norwich2129.227.528.0
    Sheffield Utd5457.958.458.2
    Southampton5245.444.544.9
    Tottenham5955.653.754.3
    Watford3435.635.435.7
    West Ham3937.235.435.6
    Wolves5958.856.356.4
    Difference from actual points
    Adj PPGPPGWPPG
    3.41.72.6
    1.81.10.0
    -0.9-1.4-1.7
    4.63.02.6
    3.52.93.2
    3.53.13.0
    -6.4 -8.1 -7.9
    1.7 0.5 -0.1
    -7.3 -7.5 -7.2
    -5.1 -8.5 -8.2
    1.5 3.6 3.1
    6.9 7.0 7.4
    -1.6 -1.9 -2.2
    -8.2 -6.5 -7.0
    -3.9 -4.4 -4.2
    6.6 7.5 7.1
    3.4 5.3 4.7
    -1.6 -1.4 -1.7
    1.8 3.6 3.4
    0.2 2.6 2.6

    The averages of the absolute differences (i.e. ignoring the minus signs) are:

    Average of absolute difference
    Adj PPGPPGWPPG
    3.74.14.0
    PPG scored the worst (4.1), WPPG performed slightly better (4.0), and the best achieving was Adj PPG (3.7). This suggests that Adj PPG is the most accurate of the three at predicting final league points.

    Conclusions

    None of the three measures, Adj PPG, PPG, and WPPG, were by any means perfect at predicting what actually happened in the Premier League. However, based on the calculations above, it can be asserted that PPG, the method actually employed globally by many football leagues for deciding curtailed seasons, is not as fair as Adj PPG. If faced with the same decision again, and with the COVID threat still lingering over us this is a not altogether unlikely possibility, the football leagues should think carefully about whether PPG is most appropriate, or whether Adj PPG would be more suitable.


    Slim Khan

    About the author

    Slim Khan is a Teaching Fellow at Warwick University, and is particularly interested in mathematics and statistics related to games and sports.

    Read more about...
    mathematics in sport
    football
    • Log in or register to post comments

    Comments

    Phil

    6 August 2020

    Permalink

    It would be interesting to see how this would have looked using an ELO calculation

    • Log in or register to post comments

    Read more about...

    mathematics in sport
    football
    University of Cambridge logo

    Plus is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
    Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

    Terms