Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

      Popular topics and tags

      Shapes

      • Geometry
      • Vectors and matrices
      • Topology
      • Networks and graph theory
      • Fractals

      Numbers

      • Number theory
      • Arithmetic
      • Prime numbers
      • Fermat's last theorem
      • Cryptography

      Computing and information

      • Quantum computing
      • Complexity
      • Information theory
      • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
      • Algorithm

      Data and probability

      • Statistics
      • Probability and uncertainty
      • Randomness

      Abstract structures

      • Symmetry
      • Algebra and group theory
      • Vectors and matrices

      Physics

      • Fluid dynamics
      • Quantum physics
      • General relativity, gravity and black holes
      • Entropy and thermodynamics
      • String theory and quantum gravity

      Arts, humanities and sport

      • History and philosophy of mathematics
      • Art and Music
      • Language
      • Sport

      Logic, proof and strategy

      • Logic
      • Proof
      • Game theory

      Calculus and analysis

      • Differential equations
      • Calculus

      Towards applications

      • Mathematical modelling
      • Dynamical systems and Chaos

      Applications

      • Medicine and health
      • Epidemiology
      • Biology
      • Economics and finance
      • Engineering and architecture
      • Weather forecasting
      • Climate change

      Understanding of mathematics

      • Public understanding of mathematics
      • Education

      Get your maths quickly

      • Maths in a minute

      Main menu

    • Home
    • Articles
    • Collections
    • Podcasts
    • Maths in a minute
    • Puzzles
    • Videos
    • Topics and tags
    • Audiences

      • cat icon
        Curiosity
      • newspaper icon
        Media
      • graduation icon
        Education
      • briefcase icon
        Policy

      Secondary menu

    • My list
    • About Plus
    • Sponsors
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us
    • Log in
    • Maths in a minute: Trisecting the angle

      4 September, 2015
      7 comments
      Trisecting an angle

      Can you divide an arbitrary angle into three equal parts using only a ruler and straightedge?

      One of the most famous problems in the history of mathematics is how to divide an angle drawn on a piece of paper into three equal parts using just a compass and a straightedge (that's a ruler without markings). Of course, you can easily measure any given angle using a protractor, divide the number you get by 3, and then measure off the desired third of the angle using the protractor again. But the point is that the protractor is prohibited — you're only allowed a compass and a straightedge. The problem goes back to the ancient Greeks, who did a lot of their geometry using only these two tools.

      To get a flavour of how this sort of problem might be solved, let's start by dividing a given angle into two equal parts, rather than three.

      Bisecting an angle

      Given two lines that meet at a point O, you can bisect the angle between them as follows. Put the point of the compass at O and draw a circle (of any radius you like). This is the blue circle in the diagram. The circle will cross the two lines at two points: call these A and B.
      Bisecting an angle

      Bisecting an angle.

      Now put the point of the compass at A and draw an arc of a circle, as shown in the diagram. Without changing the radius at which the compass is set, move its point to B and draw another arc of a circle. These are the red arcs in the diagram. The point where the two red arcs cross, P, can then be joined to O using the straightedge (the green line). The angle POB is exactly half of the angle AOB. (If the red arcs don't cross, then you need to use larger circles!)

      It's possible to prove that this method bisects any angle. You can try this for yourself (use similar triangles) or see a proof here.

      Trisecting an angle

      What about dividing an angle into three equal parts? Why is that so difficult? There are a few special cases of angles for which it can be done — for example if the angle is equal to π/2 radians or 90 degrees (see this video). You can trisect any angle if you allow yourself to use an extra dimension (see here). It's also possible to trisect an arbitrary angle if you use a ruler, rather than a plain straightedge, so that you can measure distances. However, to play by the rules you aren't allowed any marks on the straightedge at all — it must be completely blank.

      The problem of whether a general angle can be trisected remained a mathematical mystery for millennia — it wasn't until 1837 that it was proven impossible by Pierre Wantzel, a French mathematician and expert on arithmetic. This was a great achievement for a man of 23, who subsequently died at the tragically young age of 33.

      So why is it impossible? Wantzel showed that the problem of trisecting an angle is equivalent to solving a cubic equation using a straightedge-and-ruler construction. He also showed that only very few cubic equations can be solved in this way — most cannot. He thus deduced that most angles cannot be trisected.

      Never give up

      Since Wantzel's proof we know for sure that an arbitrary angle can't be trisected using a ruler and compass, but this doesn't stop people trying. Here at Plus we regularly receive emails from people who think they've cracked the problem. Needless to say, all these so-called proofs contain flaws. But there are some ways to trisect and angle, if you change the rules a little. You can find out more in Trisecting an angle with origami and Trisecting the angle with a straightedge.

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Comments

      math.nights

      10 March 2016

      Permalink

      To Arabic: https://goo.gl/zyA9zR

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Pete

      6 November 2019

      Permalink

      Last section: "Since Wantzel's proof we know for sure that an arbitrary angle can't be trisected using a ruler and straightedge, but this doesn't stop people trying." Replace "ruler" with "compass"

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Marianne

      4 December 2019

      In reply to correction by Pete

      Permalink

      Thanks for pointing that out!

      • Log in or register to post comments

      john webb

      23 March 2021

      Permalink

      It is quite simple to trisect an angle using a compass and straight edge, and Pythagorus theory proves it is possible.
      But who would believe me? Who would be interested?

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Marianne

      30 March 2021

      In reply to Trisecting an angle, is possible by john webb

      Permalink

      The proof of the impossibility of trisecting the angle with ruler and straight edge is here http://sites.mathdoc.fr/JMPA/PDF/JMPA_1837_1_2_A31_0.pdf
      This might help you to find out where you went wrong.

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Look outside the box

      21 May 2023

      In reply to Trisecting an angle, is possible by john webb

      Permalink

      It is possible to trisect an angle. I know one of the ways.

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Christian Mendoza

      30 March 2022

      Permalink

      Is it possible to use the proof provided for obtuse angles?

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Read more about...

      history of mathematics
      angle trisection
      geometry
      Maths in a minute
      University of Cambridge logo

      Plus Magazine is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
      Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

      Terms