Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Popular topics and tags

    Shapes

    • Geometry
    • Vectors and matrices
    • Topology
    • Networks and graph theory
    • Fractals

    Numbers

    • Number theory
    • Arithmetic
    • Prime numbers
    • Fermat's last theorem
    • Cryptography

    Computing and information

    • Quantum computing
    • Complexity
    • Information theory
    • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
    • Algorithm

    Data and probability

    • Statistics
    • Probability and uncertainty
    • Randomness

    Abstract structures

    • Symmetry
    • Algebra and group theory
    • Vectors and matrices

    Physics

    • Fluid dynamics
    • Quantum physics
    • General relativity, gravity and black holes
    • Entropy and thermodynamics
    • String theory and quantum gravity

    Arts, humanities and sport

    • History and philosophy of mathematics
    • Art and Music
    • Language
    • Sport

    Logic, proof and strategy

    • Logic
    • Proof
    • Game theory

    Calculus and analysis

    • Differential equations
    • Calculus

    Towards applications

    • Mathematical modelling
    • Dynamical systems and Chaos

    Applications

    • Medicine and health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biology
    • Economics and finance
    • Engineering and architecture
    • Weather forecasting
    • Climate change

    Understanding of mathematics

    • Public understanding of mathematics
    • Education

    Get your maths quickly

    • Maths in a minute

    Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • Audiences

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Outer space: The answer to runnin' in the wind

    by
    John D Barrow
    14 December, 2011
    2 comments
    sprinter

    Runners and cyclists can tolerate heat and cold but the thing they dislike most is wind. They know it produces slower lap times on loop courses. Can we show them why?

    If you run through the air at speed $V$ and your body presents a cross-sectional area $A$ in the direction you are going then you will sweep out a cylinder of air with volume $A\times V\times t$ in a time $t$. This cylinder contains a mass of air, $$M=\rho \times A\times V\times t,$$
    where $\rho $ is the density of air. The magnitude $F$ of the drag force you will feel is $$F = \frac{1}{2}\times \rho \times A \times V^2.$$ The rate of energy use, or power $P$, needed to overcome the air's resistance is equal to $F \times V$, so $$P= \frac{1}{2} \times \rho \times A\times V^{3}.$$ In practice, the quantity $A$ depends on the aerodynamic quality of what you are wearing and your degree of streamlining as well as your geometrical area. We split it up as two parts $% A=A^{\prime }\times c$, where $A^{\prime }$ is the geometrical cross-section and $c$ is a drag factor, which takes shape and clothing texture into account, and typically is $c\simeq 1$. So the power needed to run at speed $V$ through still air is $$ \frac{1}{2} \times c\times \rho \times A^{\prime }\times V^{3}.$$ A top class sprinter with a mass of $70kg$, moving through air of density $1.2 kg/m^3$, with body area $A = 1.8 \times 0.3m^2$ and drag factor $c=1$ will use about 3\% of their energy overcoming still air resistance. What if there is a wind blowing? If the wind speed is $W$ the drag force to be overcome will be proportional to $(V-W)^{2}$ if $W$ is a tailwind and $(V+W)^2$ if it is a headwind. Notice there is an asymmetry in this formula because the dependence on the speed is a square. If you ran at $4m/s$ with a following wind of $% W=2m/s$ then $(V-W)^{2}=4m^{2}/s^{2}$ where if there is a headwind of $% W=2m/s$ then $(V+W)^{2}=36m^{2}/s^{2}.$ If there is a crosswind then you feel the vector resultant of the oncoming wind that you are running through at speed $V$ and the perpendicular crosswind $W$. The magnitude of the resultant velocity is therefore $(V^2+W^2)^{1/2}$ (at an angle $\theta$ to your direction of motion, where $\tan{\theta} = W/V$.) The magnitude of the drag force experienced is proportional to its square $V^2+W^2.$ The power needed to run at speed $V$ through a crosswind is therefore proportional to the product of the running speed and the drag force, that is $V(V^2+W^2).$ We will assume that the area you present to the wind coming in at angle $\theta$ is the same as it is in your direction of motion, although it might well be slightly bigger.
    diagram

    The asymmetry noted above enables us to understand why it is always harder running laps in the wind than in windless conditions: you never gain from the tailwind what you lose into the headwind. For simplicity, suppose you run around the four sides of a square track at speed $V$ and the wind is blowing horizontally from left to right at speed $W.$ The power expended on the first (right-hand vertical) and third (left-hand vertical) straights is just proportional to $V(V^2+W^2)$ but on straight two (into the headwind) it is proportional to $V(V+W)^{2}$ while on the fourth straight it is proportional to $V(V-W)^{2}$ because the wind is following. If we add these four together we get \[ \mbox{Total power per lap }\propto V(2V^2+2W^2+V^2+W^2+2VW+V^2+W^2-2VW)=4V(V^2+W^2) \]% You see that the smallest running power of $4V^{3}$ is required when there is no wind ($W=0$): the power is always bigger with any non-zero wind speed. The best racing strategy for runners in races that cover many laps is also clear. When you are running into the wind you should try to shelter behind other runners to avoid feeling the full force of the wind. Most runners appreciate this slip-streaming trick but they often don't recognise the other part of the optimal strategy. When the wind is behind you, move out to make sure there is no one directly behind you shielding you from feeling the full benefit of the tailwind. This won't make running in the wind easier for you than when the air is still but it will make it easier than it is for your rivals.
    • Log in or register to post comments

    Comments

    Anonymous

    15 December 2011

    Permalink

    I can follow why a head-wind should slow down a cyclist (and not be of great benefit for an out and back course)...
    but
    The most energy-sapping type of wind is not a head-wind, but a side-wind (i.e. one that blows from the side).
    Clearly, the vector sum of the wind and velocity of the cyclist give a retarding force that acts at perhaps
    45 degrees, furthermore on an out and back course it has a retarding effect in both directions.

    Jeremy Boden

    • Log in or register to post comments

    Anonymous

    8 April 2013

    Permalink

    Okay, so it all is a little complicated. Here's my question: Does a 100 pound person or a 150 pound person have an easier time with a headwind? I ran a race yesterday and my pace time was affected a lot by the headwind, but I was wondering if the bigger people were having an easier or more difficult time. Thanks! Rochelle

    • Log in or register to post comments

    Read more about...

    aerodynamics
    mathematics in sport
    outerspace
    olympics

    Our Podcast: Maths on the Move

    Our Maths on the Move podcast brings you the latest news from the world of maths, plus interviews and discussions with leading mathematicians and scientists about the maths that is changing our lives.

    Apple Podcasts
    Spotify
    Podbean

    Plus delivered to you

    Keep up to date with Plus by subscribing to our newsletter or following Plus on X or Bluesky.

    University of Cambridge logo

    Plus is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
    Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

    Terms