Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Popular topics and tags

    Shapes

    • Geometry
    • Vectors and matrices
    • Topology
    • Networks and graph theory
    • Fractals

    Numbers

    • Number theory
    • Arithmetic
    • Prime numbers
    • Fermat's last theorem
    • Cryptography

    Computing and information

    • Quantum computing
    • Complexity
    • Information theory
    • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
    • Algorithm

    Data and probability

    • Statistics
    • Probability and uncertainty
    • Randomness

    Abstract structures

    • Symmetry
    • Algebra and group theory
    • Vectors and matrices

    Physics

    • Fluid dynamics
    • Quantum physics
    • General relativity, gravity and black holes
    • Entropy and thermodynamics
    • String theory and quantum gravity

    Arts, humanities and sport

    • History and philosophy of mathematics
    • Art and Music
    • Language
    • Sport

    Logic, proof and strategy

    • Logic
    • Proof
    • Game theory

    Calculus and analysis

    • Differential equations
    • Calculus

    Towards applications

    • Mathematical modelling
    • Dynamical systems and Chaos

    Applications

    • Medicine and health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biology
    • Economics and finance
    • Engineering and architecture
    • Weather forecasting
    • Climate change

    Understanding of mathematics

    • Public understanding of mathematics
    • Education

    Get your maths quickly

    • Maths in a minute

    Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • Audiences

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Political tides

    by
    Marianne Freiberger
    22 September, 2016
    Carswell

    Douglas Carswell. Photo: Steve Punter, CC BY-SA 2.0

    The politician Douglas Carswell (UKIP) has recently been arguing with the scientist Paul Nightingale about what causes the tides on Earth. Carswell said it was the gravitational influence of the Sun and Nightingale said it was the Moon. The debate came up in the context of Brexit. Using the tides as an analogy, Nightingale had argued that trade relationships with the EU were more important than those with more distant giants like China.

    Giving Carswell the benefit of the doubt (after all, hundreds of years' worth of expert opinion might be wrong) we decided to do a back-of-the-envelope calculation to see who's right.

    Let's write $m_E$ for the mass of the Earth, $m_M$ for the mass of the Moon, and $d_M$ for the distance between Earth and Moon, measured centre to centre. Newton's universal law of gravitation tells us that the gravitational force $F$ between the two is $$F = G\frac{m_Em_M}{d_M^2},$$

    where $G$ is the gravitational constant.

    However, the tidal force the Moon exerts on the Earth is calculated by working out the ratio between its gravitational pull on the near side of the Earth and its pull on the far side.
    Earth and Moon

    Diagram not to scale.

    To get the distance between the near side of the Earth to the centre of the Moon, we need to subtract the radius of the Earth, $r_E$, from $d_E.$ The gravitational pull of the Moon on the near side of the Earth is then $$F_{near} = G\frac{m_Em_M}{(d_M-r_E)^2}.$$ Similarly, to get the distance between the far side of the Earth to the centre of the Moon, we need to add the radius of the Earth, $r_E$, to $d_E.$ The gravitational pull of the Moon on the far side of the Earth is then $$F_{far} = G\frac{m_Em_M}{(d_M+r_E)^2}.$$ The ratio between the two forces is $$\frac{F_{near}}{F_{far}} = \frac{Gm_Em_M}{(d_M-r_E)^2}\times \frac{(d_M+r_E)^2 }{Gm_Em_M} = \frac{(d_M+r_E)^2 }{(d_M-r_E)^2}.$$ Now is the time to look up some values. A quick internet search suggests we use the following: $$d_M = 384,400km,$$ $$r_E=6371km.$$ Substituting these into our equation for the ratio gives $$\frac{F_{near}}{F_{far}} =\frac{(384,400+6371)^2}{(384,400-6371)^2}=1.068.$$ This means that the gravitational pull of the Moon is $6.8\%$ stronger on the near side of the Earth than it is on the far side. Now let's do the same for the Sun, writing $d_S$ for the distance between Earth and Sun, centre to centre. By the same argument as above the ratio between the gravitational influence on either side of the Earth is $$\frac{F_{near}}{F_{far}} = \frac{(d_S+r_E)^2 }{(d_S-r_E)^2}.$$ The value of $d_S$ can be taken as $$d_S = 1.5 \times 10^{8}km,$$ so we get $$\frac{F_{far}}{F_{near}} = \frac{(1.5 \times 10^{8}+6371)^2 }{(1.5 \times 10^{8}-6371)^2}=1.00017$$ This means that the gravitational pull of the Sun is only $0.017\%$ stronger on the near side of the Earth than it is on the far side. We therefore conclude that Nightingale is right. The ratio is far bigger for the Moon than it is for the Sun, so the tides we see are due to the Moon.
    Read more about...
    astronomy
    • Log in or register to post comments

    Comments

    Anonymous

    13 November 2016

    Permalink

    Interesting and fun to read.

    • Log in or register to post comments

    Read more about...

    astronomy
    University of Cambridge logo

    Plus is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
    Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

    Terms