You've heard of the golden ratio. It's portrayed in films and literature as the alternative answer to life, the Universe, and everything. And indeed, it's everywhere: from sunflower seed patterns to ammonite shells and, supposedly, the "perfect" ratio for aesthetic faces and bodies. As such, it tends to outshine its little brother you might not have heard of yet — the silver ratio.
Recall the golden ratio
Before we talk about the silver ratio, we'll recap what the golden ratio is. To paraphrase the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid:
A straight line is cut in accordance with the golden ratio when the ratio of the whole line to the longer segment is the same as the ratio of the longer segment to the shorter segment.
We can see what this looks like in the following diagram:
The silver ratio
Now let's cut a line into three segments, two longer segments of equal length and one smaller segment, such that the ratio of the whole line to one of the longer segments is the same as the ratio of one longer segment to the smaller segment. Then that line is cut in accordance with the silver ratio, which we will denote by the Greek letter $\sigma$. The numerical value of the silver ratio is approximately 2.414.Once again, we can deduce this algebraically:
\begin{eqnarray*}\sigma&=&A/B=(2A+B)/A\\ \sigma&=&A/B=2+B/A\\ \sigma&=&2+1/\sigma, \end{eqnarray*} giving the quadratic equation $$\sigma^2=2\sigma+1.$$ This has positive solution $$\sigma=\frac{2 +\sqrt{8}}{2}=\frac{2+2\sqrt{2}}{2}=1+\sqrt{2}=2.414213...$$To recap, the golden ratio involves dividing a line into two segments and the silver ratio involves cutting it into three segments, two being of equal length. This suggests the possibility of further generalisation...
Meet the family
Suppose we divide our line into $n$ segments of equal length, which we call $A$, and one smaller segment of length $B$. If we require the ratio between $A$ and $B$ to be the same as the ratio between the whole line and one of the segments of length $A$ we have $$A/B=(nA+B)/A.$$ Writing $\lambda_n$ for this ratio means that $$\lambda_n=A/B=n+B/A,$$ so in analogy to our calculations above we have $$\lambda_n=n+1/\lambda_n,$$ giving the quadratic equation $$\lambda_n^2=n \lambda_n +1.$$ The positive solutions to this equation is $$\lambda_n=\frac{n+\sqrt{n^2+4}}{2}.$$ The numbers $\lambda_n$, one for each value of $n>1,$ are called metallic ratios, or metallic means. For $n=1$ we get the golden ratio and for $n=2$ the silver one.Metallic ratios share many common properties: they are linked to infinite sequences reminiscent of the famous Fibonacci sequence, to very special rectangles and to logarithmic spirals. We will explore these in the second part of this article.
About the authors
Gokul Rajiv and Yong Zheng Yew are two former high-school level students in Singapore who happened to explore the idea of metallic means in a project and found it interesting enough to share.
Comments
Metallic Numbers
Accidental substation of 'C' for 'B' in the general formula.
Thanks for spotting that, we
Thanks for spotting that, we've fixed it.
Metallic Numbers
I enjoyed your article and appreciate your dabbling into math and then sharing. I thought I had seen most of the info on the Golden Ratio
and I believe I may have heard about the Silver Ratio. But definitely not the extension! Now I have a new investigation to pursue. Thanks for a great diversion from all the politics in the U.S.
Metallic number
The Rajiv, Yew article in Plus, January 2020 is one accessible introduction to metallic numbers or ratios. The governing equation cited is at least as interesting with a negated linear term, which highlights that a conjugate root is the negative reciprocal of the other. In the case of the golden ratio its magnitude is the same ratio minus 1; for a 'lambda' ratio indexed by n it is that minus n, as captured the article's third equation under 'Meet the family'. The reciprocal of the golden ratio we might call 'paper' (to connote other than the gold standard); the reciprocal of the silver ratio 'plastic' (ersatz legal tender); that of bronze, perhaps 'iou' - a verbal promise adequate for chump change. But beyond that coinage one is beggared with 'sou' or 'mite'. I liked one author's use (cf. Caroline Delbert in Popular Mechanics, next day) of esoteric metallic names in the periodic table (of which Gadolinium has to be a favourite), and I wonder if their reciprocals, say Tungstate might be named by their oxides - which is often how we find them in aggregates.