Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

      Popular topics and tags

      Shapes

      • Geometry
      • Vectors and matrices
      • Topology
      • Networks and graph theory
      • Fractals

      Numbers

      • Number theory
      • Arithmetic
      • Prime numbers
      • Fermat's last theorem
      • Cryptography

      Computing and information

      • Quantum computing
      • Complexity
      • Information theory
      • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
      • Algorithm

      Data and probability

      • Statistics
      • Probability and uncertainty
      • Randomness

      Abstract structures

      • Symmetry
      • Algebra and group theory
      • Vectors and matrices

      Physics

      • Fluid dynamics
      • Quantum physics
      • General relativity, gravity and black holes
      • Entropy and thermodynamics
      • String theory and quantum gravity

      Arts, humanities and sport

      • History and philosophy of mathematics
      • Art and Music
      • Language
      • Sport

      Logic, proof and strategy

      • Logic
      • Proof
      • Game theory

      Calculus and analysis

      • Differential equations
      • Calculus

      Towards applications

      • Mathematical modelling
      • Dynamical systems and Chaos

      Applications

      • Medicine and health
      • Epidemiology
      • Biology
      • Economics and finance
      • Engineering and architecture
      • Weather forecasting
      • Climate change

      Understanding of mathematics

      • Public understanding of mathematics
      • Education

      Get your maths quickly

      • Maths in a minute

      Main menu

    • Home
    • Articles
    • Collections
    • Podcasts
    • Maths in a minute
    • Puzzles
    • Videos
    • Topics and tags
    • Audiences

      • cat icon
        Curiosity
      • newspaper icon
        Media
      • graduation icon
        Education
      • briefcase icon
        Policy

      Secondary menu

    • My list
    • About Plus
    • Sponsors
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us
    • Log in
    • Krieger

      Dynamic numbers

      27 October, 2020

      Holly Krieger is one of this year's winners of a Whitehead Prize, which is awarded annually by the London Mathematical Society to mathematicians who are in an early stage of their career. Krieger works at the University of Cambridge, the home of Plus, so we took the opportunity to talk to her to find out about her work.

      "It's exciting to have my work recognised by my colleagues," Krieger told us. "This work was done in collaboration with Laura DeMarco and Hexi Ye, with lots of input from others through conversations and discussions at conferences. The prize is a nice reminder of the good fortune I have to work with all these people."

      Numbers and change

      Holly Krieger

      Holly Krieger.

      "Arithmetic dynamics is exactly what you get when you take the two words apart," says Krieger. "Arithmetic relates to those very simple notions you learn about at school: counting, integers, prime numbers and so on. These are the fundamental building blocks of what we think of as abstract mathematics." The term "dynamics" refers to systems that evolve over time. These can often be quite easily described mathematically, but can still exhibit incredibly complex behaviour in the long run.

      The two areas may appear quite different, but they actually combine quite naturally. As an example, consider the following basic arithmetic procedure: given any integer, square it and add 1. If you do this to 0, the result is 0+1=1. If you in turn apply the procedure to 1, the answer is 1+1=2. Applying it to 2 gives 4+1=5, and applying it to 5 gives 25+1=26. You could keep going like this forever, at each step in time applying the procedure to the number you got at the previous step. The result is an infinite sequence of integers, starting with

      0, 1, 2, 5, 26, 677, 458330, ...

      See here to find out more about two other 2020 Whitehead Prizes.

      "Here is a very basic question about this system," explains Krieger. "I can take each number in this sequence and factor it into its prime factors — which prime numbers appear when I do that?" There is no explicit answer to this question, but we can get a statistical handle on how many different primes appear in this way. "It's a relatively sparse set of prime numbers [that appear as factors]," says Krieger. "Because the values [in the sequence] quickly get quite large and they tend not to have small prime factors. It's not an insignificant piece of mathematics to understand these prime factors, even though it's very simple to ask the question."

      Numbers and fractals

      The dynamical system we just described doesn't exist in isolation. Rather than considering the expression x2+1 you could consider the expression x2+c. for some other number c. For some values of c (such as c=1 in our example above) the sequence you get when you start with x=0 exceeds all bounds: it escapes to infinity. For other values of c the sequence always stays within certain bounds: it doesn't escape to infinity. The most dramatic example of this is occurs when c=0. In this case, the calculation is simply 02=0 so the sequence you end up with consists entirely of 0s. Do we know which values of c lead to which kind of behaviour? The answer is yes: escape to infinity is only prevented if c=0,−1 or −2. If we allow c to take non-integer values, then the sequence stays bounded precisely when c lies in the interval [−2,1/4].

      We can go further still: we can allow c to be a complex number. Each complex number can be represented by a point in the plane (find out more here) so we could go and colour in exactly those points in the plane that, when taken as a value for c, don't give us a sequence that escapes to infinity. The picture we'd get from colouring in those points would be the famous Mandelbrot set: a beautifully intricate fractal whose shape is intimately related to the behaviour of the dynamical systems that lie behind it.

      The Mandelbrot set

      The Mandelbrot set. Image by Wolfgang Beyer.

      The Mandelbrot set, too, plays a major role in Krieger's work. "There are some special values inside the Mandelbrot set," explains Krieger. We already saw above that c=0 results in a dynamical system forever stuck at 0. There are other values of c that lead to similarly limited dynamics (you might want to try c=-1) . "Studying where these post-critically finite points lie in the Mandelbrot set is the type of question that I work on."

      You can find out more about the Mandelbrot set and the related dynamical systems in this Plus article.

      Numbers and people

      What drew Krieger to working in arithmetic dynamics? Partly it was the age-old lure of number theory, whose seemingly simple questions often turn out fiendishly hard to prove. "I like the simplicity of the questions, combined with the difficulty and depth of the techniques," she says.

      But while number theory is old, arithmetic dynamics is new. "Arithmetic dynamics is a relatively young field, so it has a lot of energy. In the 1990s it was realised that there's a very deep connection [between the theory of dynamical systems] and hard questions in number theory. The question was, 'what can we do with this analogy; is there power there?' This led to an entirely new way of studying dynamical systems. It's that innovation that I liked."

      People too played a role in Krieger's decision to go into the field. "The leaders in the field when I went into it were high-calibre mathematicians, doing fantastic things, without even a hint of arrogance or exclusivity. The energy of the people and the atmosphere of the field is what drew me in."

      Read more about...
      dynamical system
      complex dynamics
      Mandelbrot set
      arithmetic dynamics
      number theory
      University of Cambridge
      women in mathematics
      • Log in or register to post comments

      Comments

      Wiki Webs

      1 July 2022

      Permalink

      Under Numbers and Fractals, the sentence "In this case, the calculation is simply 0^2=2 so the sequence you end up with consists entirely of 0s." has a rather glaring typo.

      "0^2=2" should read "0^2 = 0"

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Marianne

      8 September 2022

      In reply to One flew past the spelling checker... by Wiki Webs

      Permalink

      Thanks for spotting the typo, we've corrected.

      • Log in or register to post comments

      Read more about...

      dynamical system
      complex dynamics
      Mandelbrot set
      arithmetic dynamics
      number theory
      University of Cambridge
      women in mathematics
      University of Cambridge logo

      Plus Magazine is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
      Copyright © 1997 - 2025. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

      Terms